• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Ethan Kemp

New York University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    1
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • New York University
    Department of Philosophy
    Doctoral student
Homepage
New York City, New York, United States of America
0009-0004-5871-373X
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
Meta-Ethics
Metaphilosophy
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence
  • All publications (1)
  •  435
    How LLMs Might Think
    with Joseph Gottlieb and Matt Trager
    Mind and Language. forthcoming.
    Do large language models (“LLMs”) think? Daniel Stoljar and Zhihe Vincent Zhang have recently developed an argument from rationality for the claim that LLMs do not think. We contend, however, that the argument from rationality not only falters, but leaves open an intriguing possibility: that LLMs engage only in arational, associative forms of thinking, and have purely associative minds. Our positive claim is that if LLMs think at all, they likely think precisely in this manner.
    Thought and Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence MethodologyRepresentation in Connectionis…Read more
    Thought and Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence MethodologyRepresentation in ConnectionismLarge Language ModelsThe Nature of Artificial IntelligenceInference
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback