Farzad Didehvar

He is a Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science professor at Amir Kabir University (Tehran Polytechnic), He was born in Tehran in 1969. His main interest is the impact of Fuzzy time on Science in general, especially the theory of Computation and Physics. He introduces the "Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation" and "Fuzzy time-particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" in this regard. He is interested in knowing whether different types of cultures, especially non-western ones, could impact science and Technology and if so, how much. Is it a big deal?

Autobiography

I was born in 1969 in Iran. During my childhood, in 1979, we had the Iranian revolution. Some questions and debates turn to be important from that time, however, they were changed somewhat. 1. Mind and Machine (Idealism vs Materialism). These discussions have been around me since Childhood. 2. Systems and Individuals (Justice, Freedom,...) 3. Revolutions in Science, specially Physics( Quantum Mechanics and different interpretation of it, Special Relativity, General relativity. My acquaintance with the second and the third was started by Gamov's book, but the first was much later when I was a student at the University of Sharif). 4. How to solve problems and the art of problem-solving (Starting with a translation of Polya's book from high school) 5. Logic: by some books from high school and later in University. 6. To be interested in Mathematics, from when I was 12 years old and later I decide on Math as the subject of study and research. 7. To understand the importance of Computer Science (From 8. To know more and more about Complexity Theory as a subject common between Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. 9. My PhD thesis is entitled by "Some Concepts and Problems in Theory of Complexity in Structures" 2002 10. Trying to progress in the P vs NP problem as a continuation of my Thesis subject. 10.1 Trying to use the Unexpected Hanging Paradox to impact this problem. The idea was to have a similar way that we have in Godel proof. 10.2 The idea of fuzzy time to cope with the above paradox and P vs NP problem. 10.3 Introducing "Theory of Fuzzy time Computation" and "Fuzzy Time-Particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" He is a Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science professor at Amir Kabir University (Tehran Polytechnic), He was born in Tehran in 1969. His main interest is the impact of Fuzzy time on Science in general, especially the theory of Computation and Physics. He introduces the "Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation" and "Fuzzy time-particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" in this regard. He is interested in knowing whether different types of cultures, especially non-western ones, could impact science and Technology and if so, how much. Is it a big deal?

Autobiography I was born in 1969 in Iran. During my childhood, in 1979, we had the Iranian revolution. Some questions and debates turn to be important from that time, however, they were changed somewhat. I try to list some of them

1. Mind and Machine (Idealism vs Materialism). These discussions have been around me since Childhood.
2. Systems and Individuals (Justice, Freedom,...)
3. Revolutions in Science, especially Physics( Quantum Mechanics and different interpretations of it, Special Relativity, General relativity. My acquaintance with the second and the third was started by Gamov's book, but the first was much later when I was a student at the University of Sharif).
4. How to solve problems and the Art of problem-solving (Starting with a translation of Polya's book from high school)
5. Logic: by some books from high school and later in University.
6. Before Highschool
7. High School
8. Undergraduate

9. IPM

10. To become interested in Mathematics, when I was 12 years old I decided to Mathematics as the subject of study and research.

11. To understand the importance of Computer Science (From BS)

12. To study Complexity Theory as a subject common between Mathematics and Theoretical Computer science

13. Logical approaches. Visiting Lyon 1...

14. My PhD thesis is entitled "Some Concepts and Problems in Theory of Complexity in Structures"200210. Trying to make a progress in the P vs NP problem as a continuation of my Thesis subject. 10.1 Trying to use the Unexpected Hanging Paradox to impact this problem. The idea was to have a similar way that we have in Godel proof. 10.2 The idea of fuzzy time to cope with the above paradox and P vs NP problem. 10.3 Introducing "Theory of Fuzzy time Computation" and "Fuzzy Time-Particle Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics".

A DESCRIPTION

You can find this text in: https://philevents.org/event/show/124806

There are different types of approaches to solve P vs NP, some of them are logical approaches. The lecturer's PhD thesis [11] is based on one of these logical approaches 2002 [2], [6]. Till 2011, he and some other logicians made an unsuccessful attempt to shed light on this problem in this way. In 2010‐2011, he started to introduce another logical approach based on paradoxes, more specifically ? Unexpected Hanging Paradox? The goal is to use paradoxes similar to applying paradoxes (Liar Paradoxes) in Godel's Incompleteness Theorem [14], [15], [16]. In [5], 16, he showed by defining a new version of this paradox, we face a contradiction, not a paradox. To cope with this situation, in 2019 Fuzzy Time [4], 17 came into the centre of the subject and discussion. Nevertheless, we have concepts similar to the fuzziness of Time and space in the history of science, Mathematics, Philosophy and Physics [7], [12], [13]. Based on that, the speaker claimed a new interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, the Fuzzy time‐particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics [1], [3], [4]. Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation?, is introduced in [8], [9], [10], monthly seminars of the Iranian Association of Logic [18], and The 10th annual conference of the Iranian Association for Logic (IAL) (2023) [19]. In 2023, this Theory was introduced in a paper in HAL [9] and is now in development. In this lecture, after defining this Theory, we explain a part of it in detail, and as the main conclusion, we prove TC+CON(TC^* )ͰP≠NP. There is an attempt to generalize solutions (Bi-Theory Method) as a method, to shed light on the other problems in [20].

References. 1. Computing Fuzzy Time Function, F.Didehvar, Philpapers, SSRN 2022

1. B.Poizat, Les petit cailloux. Une approach modele-theorique de l?Algorithmie , Nur al-Mantiq wal-Ma?rifah, no.3.Ale?as, Lyon 1995, 2 pp.

2. Does accepting the Fuzzy Time-Particle interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, refute the other interpretations? (Is fuzziness of time checkable experimentally?), F.Didehvar, Philpapers, SSRN, 2021

3. Fuzzy time a solution for unexpected hanging Paradox ( a Fuzzy interpretation Of Quantum Mechanics)), PhilPapers 2019-4-13

4. Is Classical Mathematics appropriate for the Theory of Computation? F.Didehvar, PhilPapers(Manuscript), 2017,2018,2019, Handbook of the 6th World Congress and School on Universal Logic, Vichy France, 2018

5. L. Blum, M.Shub, S. Smale, ?On a Theory of Computation and Complexity over the real numbers: NP-Comleness, Recursive Functions and Universal Machines, Bull.Amer. Math.Soc.(N.S.) 21 (1): 1-46 (July 1989).

6. M. Van Aten, On BrouwerWadsworth Philosopher's Series, 2004 (PersianTranslation by M. Ardeshir)

7. TC+CON(TC*) deduce P is not equal to NP, F.Didehvar, PhilPapers(Manuscript), 2020

9.-Theory of Fuzzy Time Computation (TC^* vs TC &TQC), hal-04330281

1. P ≠ NP, by Accepting to Make a Shift in the Theory (Time as a Fuzzy Concept), F.Didehvar, PhilPapers, SSRN, 2021

2. Some Concepts and Problems in Theory of Complexity in Structures, published as Generalization of Some Concepts Theory in Structures?, PhD Thesis, 2002

3. C.Wetterich, Probabilistic Time, Foundation of Physics, 2012

4. Zeno Paradox, Unexpected Hanging Paradox (Modeling of Reality & Physical Reality, A Historical-Philosophical view), F.Didehvar, PhilPapers, (Manuscript)2022 Conferences

5. When proof doesn't show the Truth, Philosophy Day in Iran (Logic and Philosophical Logic, Tradition and Modern), 2010/11/19, Tehran, Iran.

6. A Semantic Situation without Syntax (Non axiomatizibility of Theories), Universal Logic 2015, (5th World Congress and school, 2015/6/28, Istanbul University.

7. Is Classical Mathematics Appropriate for Theory of Computation?, Universal Logic 2018, (6th World Congress and school, 2018/6/28, Vichy University Campus.

8. Fuzzy Time, from Paradox to Paradox, The 50th Annual Iranian Mathematics Conferences, Shiraz, Iran, Shiraz University, 26-29 August 2019, Shiraz University.

9. The impacts of Logic, Paradoxes on one side and Theory of Computation on the other side (Fuzzy Time Computation), (TC*، زمان فازی) تاثیر و تاثر منطق و پارادوکسها بر نظریه محاسبات عام 20 June 2022 (In Persian), https://ialogic.ir/index.php/2022-12-11-17-07--09/lectures/258--2022-06--15--05-07-35 The slides are in Philpapers.

10. About a Proof (TC + CON(TC ∗)Ͱ(P≠NP), The 10th Annual Conference of the Iranian Logic Association, February 22, 2023-

11. Bi-Theory Method & Navier Stokes Problem, PhilPapers, 2024-07-13

NEWS

Some interesting News about the above:

1. Manon Bischoff, Evidence of ‘Negative Time’ Found in Quantum Physics Experiment, Scientific American, September 30, 2024

2. Mingu Kang et all, Measurements of the quantum geometric tensor in solids , Nature Physics, Published: 25 November 2024 Jordan Josef, the Shape of electrons is revealed for the first time through a big advance in quantum physics, 1/25/2025

3. Antonia Seiferet et all, Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 19/12/2024

(The dark matter model is replaced by a novel model. In this model time passes differently in the different places of space).

1. Thomas Guff et al, Emergence of opposing arrows of time in open quantum systems 29/1/2025

(University of Surrey, Physicists uncover evidence of two arrows of time emerging from Quantum Realm)

SOCIAL PROBLEMS 2/4/2025 One of the major problem here is "How do theories specially Scientific Theories take shape in the societies?" One of the central problems make scientific theories much complex is

"Seemingly, these theories have their own logic and methods independent of the society in which these theories are created, invented or discovered."

The above statement, how much true how much not is one of the central thesis of our issue and a hub for discussions. (DISCUSSIONS HUBS). Here, the author tries to show how step by step he understand how theories work and take shapes. Some of this work is related to the special features of Iranian society. ....