• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Georg Neugebauer

Universität Leipzig
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    9
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
  •  News and Updates
    3

 More details
  • Universität Leipzig
    Post-doctoral fellow
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion
  • All publications (9)
  •  28
    Gott gebe Wachstum: historische und systematische Studien zur protestantischen Wirtschaftsethik nach Max Weber (edited book)
    with Constantin Plaul and Florian Priesemuth
    De Gruyter. 2021.
    Max Weber now classically defined the relationship between religion and the economy by identifying the religious roots of modern capitalism. This volume expands upon his inquiry and readjusts it, but also critically reclassifies the question itself. Case studies examine how the sometimes precarious relationship between religion and the economy can and should be configured in modern conditions.
  • Die Grenzen der Rationalität in Max Webers frühen Aufsätzen zur Wissenschaftslehre
    In Christoph Asmuth & Simon Gabriel Neuffer (eds.), Irrationalität, Königshausen & Neumann. 2015.
  •  87
    Georg Neugebauer: Affekt und Wille im Aufbau von Religion. Problemgeschichtliche Bezüge und systematische Aspekte der Lutherdeutung Karl Holls
    Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 25 (1-2): 83-103. 2018.
    Karl Holl’s interpretation of Luther’s concept of religion is based on his theoretical understanding of will. The research literature has often overlooked the fact that this foundation itself is based on a theory of emotions. The psychological implications of his interpretation of Luther, which are merely implied by Holl, can be decoded in the context of contemporary research, in this article on the basis of work by Hermann Siebeck and Reinhold Seeberg. In this way, this article systematically h…Read more
    Karl Holl’s interpretation of Luther’s concept of religion is based on his theoretical understanding of will. The research literature has often overlooked the fact that this foundation itself is based on a theory of emotions. The psychological implications of his interpretation of Luther, which are merely implied by Holl, can be decoded in the context of contemporary research, in this article on the basis of work by Hermann Siebeck and Reinhold Seeberg. In this way, this article systematically highlights the complex structure of Luther’s concept of religion, as interpreted by Holl, with regard to its conceptual history.
  •  28
    Matthias Schloßberger: Geschichtsphilosophle, Reihe Studienbücher (review)
    Journal for the History of Modern Theology/Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte 23 (2): 293-296. 2016.
  •  19
    Die werkgeschichtliche Entwicklung der Christologie Tillichs
    International Yearbook for Tillich Research 6 (1): 1-22. 2011.
  •  16
    Die geistphilosophischen Grundlagen der Kulturtheologie Tillichs vor dem Hintergrund seiner Schelling- und Husserlrezeption
    In Christian Danz & Werner Schüßler (eds.), Paul Tillichs Theologie der Kultur: Aspekte - Probleme - Perspektiven, De Gruyter. pp. 38-63. 2011.
  •  38
    Die werkgeschichtliche Entwicklung der Christologie Tillichs
    International Yearbook for Tillich Research 6 (1): 1-22. 2011.
  •  59
    Freiheit als philosophisches Prinzip - Die Fichte-Interpretation des frühen Tillich
    Fichte-Studien 36 (1): 181-198. 2012.
  •  49
    Δι᾽ ἑνὸϛ πάντα – Tillich im Wingolf
    International Yearbook for Tillich Research 11 (1): 149-174. 2016.
    Name der Zeitschrift: International Yearbook for Tillich Research Jahrgang: 11 Heft: 1 Seiten: 149-174.
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback