-
3Las armas de la crítica (edited book)Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 2018.
-
7Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
9Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
4Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
7Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
10Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
10Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
8Social criticism, dissonance, and progress: A socio-epistemic approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 49 (8): 975-997. 2023.The immanent approach adopted by most contemporary representatives of the Critical Theory tradition has generally the purpose of offering a foundation for social criticism that, without relying exclusively on explicit or factually accepted principles, avoids both the potential arbitrariness of subjective judgment and the appeal to transcendent criteria. However, this project has not yet paid much attention to the socio-epistemic elements related to the intersubjective praxis of criticism. Based …Read more
-
5Judicial review without shortcuts: A vindication of the knower from a pragmatist and critical theoretical approachPhilosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1): 54-57. 2020.In my article, I want to focus on the critique Cristina Lafont makes to expertocracy and epistocracy, mainly through the institution of judicial review, to which she dedicates chapter 7 and part of...
-
8Die Frage nach der Legitimität sozialer Ordnungen. Zu Hegels Kritik der individuellen FreiheitHegel-Jahrbuch 2017 (1): 295-300. 2017.
-
18Power and dissonance: Exclusion as a key category for a critical social analysisConstellations 24 (4): 608-622. 2017.
-
68Libertad e inclusión. Reflexiones sobre el concepto de integración política en HegelAreté. Revista de Filosofía 22 (1): 7-26. 2010.Partiendo de una breve descripción de las características del modelo comunitarista de integración social con el propósito de marcar distancia y aclarar algunos malentendidos en lo relativo a sus vínculos con la Sittlichkeit hegeliana, en el presente trabajo se analizan algunos de los textos claves de Hegel en los cuales se aprecia su comprensión de la unidad política. Ligado a ello, se intenta reconstruir la noción de integración que se desprende de dichos textos para, finalmente, concluir con a…Read more
-
21Miguel Giusti (ed.), El retorno del espíritu. Motivos hegelianos en la filosofía práctica contemporánea, Lima: PUCP, 2003, 294 pp (review)Areté. Revista de Filosofía 17 (2): 315-325. 2005.