-
11Review of “Living Philosophy: An Introduction to Moral Thought, 3/e” (review)Essays in Philosophy 10 (1): 14. 2009.
-
24Albert R. Jonsen, A Short History of Medical Ethics Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 30 (1): 45-46. 2010.
-
10The Philosophy of Forgiveness is multi-dimensional and complex. As recent scholarly philosophical works on forgiveness illustrate, incorporating personal, relational, political, ethical, psychological, and religious dimensions into one consistent conception of “forgiveness” is difficult. As part of Vernon Press’s series on the Philosophy of Forgiveness, Explorations of Forgiveness: Personal, Relational, and Religious begins the task of creating a consistent multidimensional account of forgivenes…Read more
-
8Appeal to RidiculeIn Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments, Wiley. 2018-05-09.This chapter focuses on one of the common fallacies in Western philosophy, appeal to ridicule. An appeal to ridicule is closely related to an ad hominem argument because both attack the person. There is a similarity between an appeal to ridicule and an appeal to emotion in that both attempt to bypass rational assessment of a point of view and elicit an emotional reaction from the audience. An appeal to ridicule may be an attempt to elicit humor at another's expense, or it may be an attempt to el…Read more
-
5Black Museum and Righting WrongsIn William Irwin & David Kyle Johnson (eds.), Black Mirror and Philosophy, Wiley. 2020.In Black Museum, a young woman is out to take revenge on the man who imprisoned her father's digital self in a museum exhibit that allows sadistic visitors to reenact his execution. While the exhibit is morally detestable and some may think that the museum's curator gets what he deserves in the end, the woman's act of vengeance is morally disturbing. This chapter explores Martha Nussbaum's account of anger and forgiveness and considers Christian and Buddhist teachings. An argument by David Kyle …Read more
-
6Surrogate Decision Making and Intellectual VirtueJournal of Clinical Ethics 25 (4): 291-295. 2014.Patients can be harmed by a religiously motivated surrogate decision maker whose decisions are contrary to the standard of care; therefore, surrogate decision making should be held to a high standard. Stewart Eskew and Christopher Meyers proposed a two-part rule for deciding which religiously based decisions to honor: (1) a secular reason condition and (2) a rationality condition. The second condition is based on a coherence theory of rationality, which they claim is accessible, generous, and cu…Read more
-
26Medically valid religious beliefsJournal of Medical Ethics 34 (6): 437-440. 2008.Patient requests for “inappropriate” medical treatment based on religious beliefs should have special standing. Nevertheless, not all such requests should be honored, because some are morally disturbing. The trouble lies in deciding which ones count. This paper proposes criteria that would qualify a religious belief as medically valid to help physicians decide which requests to respect. The four conditions suggested are that the belief is shared by a community, is deeply held, would pass the tes…Read more
-
8Medically Valid Religious BeliefsDissertation, . 2012.This dissertation explores conflicts between religion and medicine, cases in which cultural and religious beliefs motivate requests for inappropriate treatment or the cessation of treatment, requests that violate the standard of care. I call such requests M-requests (miracle or martyr requests). I argue that current approaches fail to accord proper respect to patients who make such requests. Sometimes they are too permissive, honoring M-requests when they should not; other times they are too str…Read more
-
21Righteous Indignation: Christian Philosophical and Theological Perspectives on Anger (edited book)Fortress Academic. 2021.Righteous Indignation explores the philosophy of Christian anger—for example what anger is, what it means for God to be angry, and when anger is morally appropriate. The contributors examine several dimensions of the topic, including divine wrath, imprecatory psalms, and the proper place of anger in the life of Christians today.
-
93Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusionsJournal of Medical Ethics 38 (11): 652-656. 2012.This paper explores the scriptural and theological reasons given by Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) to refuse blood transfusions. Julian Savulescu and Richard W Momeyer argue that informed consent should be based on rational beliefs and that the refusal of blood transfusions by JWs is irrational, but after examining the reasons given by JWs, I challenge the claim that JW beliefs are irrational. I also question whether we should give up the traditional notion of informed consent
-
30The Ethics of Anger (edited book)Lexington Books. 2020.This book provides a variety of diverse perspectives related to the ethics of anger, some more analytical in nature, others focused on practical issues, some in defense of anger, and others arguing against its necessity. This book is an essential resource for scholars who want to reflect critically on the place of anger in contemporary life.
-
38Author Court D. Lewis Meets Critics on Repentance and the Right to ForgivenessThe Acorn 19 (1): 19-41. 2019.Court D. Lewis, author of Repentance and the Right to Forgiveness, presents a rights-based theory of ethics grounded in eirenéism, a needs-based theory of rights (inspired by Nicholas Wolterstorff) that seeks peaceful flourishing for all moral agents. This approach creates a moral relationship between victims and wrongdoers such that wrongdoers owe victims compensatory obligations. However, one further result is that wrongdoers may be owed forgiveness by victims. This leads to the “repugnant imp…Read more
-
7Review of Living Philosophy: An Introduction to Moral Thought, 3/e, by Ray Billington (review)Essays in Philosophy 10 (1): 157-159. 2009.
-
40The Philosophy of Forgiveness - Volume IV: Christian Perspectives on Forgiveness (edited book)Vernon Press. 2019.The Philosophy of Forgiveness, Volume IV: Christian Perspectives on Forgiveness is a collection of essays that explores different Christian views on forgiveness. Each essay takes up a different topic, such as the nature of divine forgiveness, the basis for forgiving our enemies, and the limits of forgiveness. In some chapters, the views of different philosophers and theologians are explored, figures such as St. John Climacus, Bonaventure, and Nietzsche. In other chapters, the concept of forgiven…Read more
-
31The end of religious exemptions from immunisation requirements?Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (2): 114-117. 2020.The purpose of this paper is to propose a middle ground in the debate over religious exemptions from measles vaccination requirements. It attempts to strike a balance between public health concerns on the one hand and religious objections on the other that avoids two equally serious errors: making religious liberty an absolute and disregarding religious beliefs altogether. Some think that the issue is straightforward: science has spoken and the benefits to public health outweigh any other concer…Read more
-
The Philosophy of Forgiveness Volume III: Forgiveness in World Religions (edited book)Vernon Press. 2019.
-
Austin Dacey, The Secular Conscience: Why Belief Belongs in Public LifePhilosophy in Review 29 (2): 98. 2009.
-
20Michael Banner, Christian Ethics: A Brief History. Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 30 (4): 237-239. 2010.
-
40Martha C. Nussbaum, Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 37 (1): 25-27. 2017.
-
16Faith and Futility in the ICUHastings Center Report 45 (1): 9-10. 2015.James is a seventy‐two‐year‐old man with end‐stage dementia who was transferred from another hospital. At the time of transfer James had sepsis from two multidrug‐resistant organisms, respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support, renal insufficiency, pancytopenia, and hypotension requiring vasopressors. He has severe contractures and foot drop, has a feeding tube, and has been nonverbal for several months. His son, Paul, is requesting full code and treatment focused on recovery despite Jame…Read more
-
11Hume and Religious MiraclesPhilosophia Christi 13 (1): 165-168. 2011.Robert Larmer critiques my view that the correct interpretation of David Hume’s argument against miracles in “Of Miracles” is that no testimony of a miracle can serve as the foundation of a religion. Larmer thinks that there is no unified argument in the section but says that Hume’s essential argument is that there can never be a justification for believing that a miracle has occurred on the basis of testimony. I raise a number of problems with Larmer’s interpretation, not the least of which is …Read more
-
29Korsgaard and Non-Sentient LifeBetween the Species 17 (1). 2014.Christine Korsgaard argues for the moral status of animals and our obligations to them. She grounds this obligation on the notion that we share a common identity, our animal nature, with them and that animal pain represents a public reason that binds us; nevertheless, her distinctive attempt to enlist Kantian arguments to account for our obligations to animals has a startling implication that she fails to adequately consider: that we have direct duties to plants as well
-
41The Tolerance of Ritual Male Infant CircumcisionAmerican Journal of Bioethics 15 (2): 48-49. 2015.Jacobs and Arora (2015) argue convincingly for the permissibility of ritual male infant circumcision in general, but they allow for the state to prohibit the practice if it violates local norms. They say that such a ban would be permissible unless it amounts to unethical discrimination. In other words, if male infant circumcision is outlawed, then, as they say, “the same state should protect all children from all unnecessary procedures and practices that are equally uncomfortable and unsafe.” Wh…Read more
-
23Cultural sensitivity in paediatricsJournal of Medical Ethics 39 (9): 579-581. 2013.In a recent Journal of Medical Ethics article, ‘Should Religious Beliefs Be Allowed to Stonewall a Secular Approach to Withdrawing and Withholding Treatment in Children?’, Joe Brierley, Jim Linthicum and Andy Petros argue for rapid intervention in cases of futile life-sustaining treatment. In their experience, when discussions of futility are initiated with parents, parents often appeal to religion to ‘stonewall’ attempts to disconnect their children from life support. However, I will argue that…Read more
-
14Martha C. Nussbaum , The New Religious Intolerance: Overcoming the Politics of Fear in an Anxious Age . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 34 (5): 262-264. 2014.
-
53Understanding David Hume’s Argument against MiraclesPhilosophia Christi 12 (2): 373-391. 2010.The proper interpretation of Hume’s argument against miracles in Section 10 of An Inquiry concerning Human Understanding has been heavily debated. In this paper, I argue that Hume’s main argument has the intended conclusion that there can never be a sufficient justification for believing that a miracle has occurred on the basis of testimony sufficient to make it a basis for a religion. I also consider and argue against other common readings.
Gregory Bock
University of Texas At Tyler
-
University of Texas At TylerAssistant Professor
Areas of Specialization
Biomedical Ethics |
Forgiveness |
Normative Ethics |
Applied Ethics |
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion |
Applied Ethics |
Normative Ethics |