• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Gyula Klima

Fordham University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    170
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    3
  •  News and Updates
    37

 More details
  • Fordham University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
New York City, New York, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Intentionality
Semantic Theories
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
  • All publications (170)
  •  16
    Metaphysical Alternatives vs. Alternative Semantics (edited book)
    with Alex Hall and Timothy Kearns
    Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2025.
    Medieval MetaphysicsMedieval Logic
  •  23
    “Form and Existence” in Retrospect, and Looking Forward
    American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1): 111-128. 2026.
    This paper commemorates Peter Geach’s seminal paper and its catalytic role in the somewhat conflicted and controversial emergence of “analytical Thomism,” showing the way out of the conflicts, and the opportunities opening up on this way to engage even such “trendy” contemporary issues as computerized natural language processing and artificial intelligence.
  •  3
    The Medieval Problem of Universals
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2000.
  •  11
    Semantic Content in Aquinas and Ockham
    In Margaret Cameron & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language, Oxford University Press. pp. 121-135. 2015.
    In the wake of contemporary turns to externalist theories of mind and language, historians of philosophy have re-evaluated philosophical theories of linguistic content from the past. Motivated in part by the frequent mischaracterization of most pre-twentieth-century theories as ‘internalist’, locating linguistic content somehow ‘in the head’, scholars point to philosophers such as the fourteenth-century Franciscan philosopher William of Ockham (_c_. 1287–1347), who seem to have certain externali…Read more
    In the wake of contemporary turns to externalist theories of mind and language, historians of philosophy have re-evaluated philosophical theories of linguistic content from the past. Motivated in part by the frequent mischaracterization of most pre-twentieth-century theories as ‘internalist’, locating linguistic content somehow ‘in the head’, scholars point to philosophers such as the fourteenth-century Franciscan philosopher William of Ockham (_c_. 1287–1347), who seem to have certain externalist commitments about linguistic (and mental) content. Gyula Klima’s ‘Semantic Content in Aquinas and Ockham’ elaborates upon this characterization of Ockham. If Ockham is a semantic externalist, then Thomas Aquinas (1225–74)—and a host of philosophers before him—ought to be characterized as ‘hyper-externalists’.
  •  11
    Utrum organum sensus communis sit in corde vel in cerebro seu in capite; nullus enim alibi ponitur illud organum
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 584-609. 2023.
    Arguunt medici quod sit in cerebro et non in corde, auctoritate Galeni, Avicennae, Platonis et plurimorum aliorum, qui dicunt quod est in cerebro in eius anteriori concavitate.
  •  22
    Utrum omnis notitia sit de numero bonorum, id est utrum omnis notitia sit bona
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 16-29. 2023.
    Arguitur primo quod non, quia dicitur in tertio Metaphysicae quod in mathematica non est bonum neque finis.
  •  21
    Utrum universale nihil est aut posterius est
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 52-67. 2023.
    Arguitur primo quod universale sit prius singularibus, et magis universale minus universalibus per Porphyrium qui hoc saepe dicit.
  •  19
    Utrum sensus possit decipi circa sensibile proprium sibi
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 286-305. 2023.
    Arguitur quod sic quia intellectus est multo potentioris virtutis et certioris quam sensus, sed ipse potest errare circa obiectum proprium; igitur, magis sensus. Consequentia tenet per locum a minori. Minus enim videtur quod virtus potentior et certior debeat decipi quam potentia vel virtus minus certa.
  •  8
    Utrum numerus, magnitudo, figura, motus, et quies sint sensibilia communia et per se
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 320-345. 2023.
    Utrum numerus, magnitudo, figura, motus, et quies sint sensibilia communia et per se. Arguitur primo de numero quod non, quia dicitur quarto Physicorum quod non potest numerare nisi anima et non quaelibet anima sed intellectiva. Sed non potest numerare non cognoscens numerum secundum rationem secundum quam dicitur numerus.
  •  20
    Utrum accidentia magnam partem conferant ad cognoscendum quod quid est
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 68-83. 2023.
    Et arguitur primo quod non, quia sequeretur quod esset circulatio in demonstrationibus, quod est contra Aristotelem primo Posteriorum dicentem Şcirculo quoque demonstrare est impossibile.Ť Se queretur etiam quod esset petitio principii, quod est inconveniens.
  •  16
    Utrum odor multiplicatur realiter per medium vel spiritualiter seu intentionaliter
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 382-401. 2023.
    Arguitur quod sit in medio realiter quia ex quo ipse est in medio, oportet quod sit ibi aliqua res, et hoc est esse realiter.
  •  23
    Utrum sit idem sonus quando ego loquor quem quilibet vestrum audit
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 368-381. 2023.
    Arguitur quod non quia, cum Socrates et Plato sint separati secundum locum et situm, non est idem quod pervenit ad aurem So- cratis et ad aurem Platonis.
  •  19
    Circa tertium librum De anima quaeritur primo utrum intellectus humanus sit virtus passiva ab intelligibili
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 632-645. 2023.
    Arguitur quod non, quia omne quod patiturmovetur, licet non e converso, ut habetur primo De generatione. Et Şomne quod movetur est divisibile,Ť ut habetur sexto Physicorum. Et intellectus non est divisibilis; ergo nec movetur nec patitur.
  •  35
    Utrum tactus sit unus sensus vel plures
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 490-503. 2023.
    Arguitur primo quod sit unicus, scilicet in uno homine, quia ex parte animae non est plurificatus, cum sit una anima et indivisibilis. Et similiter ex parte corporis est unus, cum corpus sit unum continuum licet sit divisibile.
  •  16
    Utrum color sit proprium obiectum visus
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 346-355. 2023.
    Arguitur quod sic quia Commentator dicit quod color est visibilis sicut homo est risibilis. Et tamen etiam ponitur communiter quod homo est per se et primo risibilis.
  •  21
    Utrum naturalissimum operum in viventibus sit generare sibi simile
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 218-237. 2023.
    Et arguitur quod non quia operationes magis propriae viventibus sunt eis magis naturales quam aliae. Sed nutritio est viventi ma- gis propria, quia convenit omni viventi et etiam semper per totam vitam et nulli alteri quam viventi convenit.
  •  14
    Utrum necesse est ad sentiendum esse sensum agentem
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 266-285. 2023.
    Arguitur quod sic quia sicut se habet intellectus ad intelligibilia, sic etiam sensus ad sensibilia, ut habetur tertio huius; et apparet quod sit conveniens proportio; sed ad intelligendum necesse est concurrere intellectum agentem, ut apparet tertio huius; ergo etc.
  •  14
    Utrum scientia de anima sit de numero difficillimorum
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 42-51. 2023.
    Et arguitur primo quod non, quia Şillud quod per superabundantiam dicitur uni soli convenit,Ť ut dicit Aristoteles in Topicorum; ergo non sunt plura difficillima; ergo nihil est de numero eorum.
  •  20
    Utrum intellectus humanus sit forma substantialis corporis humani
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 658-673. 2023.
    Arguitur quod sic, per definitionem animae datam in secundo huius quam Aristotelis dicit esse ŞcommunissimamŤ, et per conse- 5 quens ipsa convenit animae intellectivae. Ibi enim dicitur quod anima est Şactus corporisŤ, etc. Idem autem est actus et forma; ergo etc.
  •  14
    Utrum oporteat praeter sensum communem ponere alios sensus interiores
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 560-583. 2023.
    Arguitur quod sic, quia cum Aristoteles determinasset in secundo huius de sensibus exterioribus et de sensu communi, ipse conse- quenter determinavit de phantasia tamquam de alia virtute.
  •  15
    Utrum omnis scientia sit de numero honorabilium
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 30-41. 2023.
    Arguitur quod non, quia tunc sequeretur quod omnes scientes deberent honorari. Consequens est falsum.
  •  21
    Utrum intellectus humanus possit intelligere plura simul
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 890-907. 2023.
    Arguitur quod non, quia dicitur quarto Metaphysicae, Şqui non unum intelligit nihil intelligit,Ť et in Topicis dicitur, Şcontingit plura scire, unum autem solum intelligere.Ť.
  •  16
    Utrum subiectum proprium in scientia libri De anima sit anima vel ille terminus anima vel corpus animatum vel quoddam aliud aut nihil
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 4-15. 2023.
    Et arguitur primo quod sit corpus animatum, quia operationes et passiones hic consideratae sunt compositi ex corpore et anima et non animae sine corpore nec corporis sine anima.
  •  13
    Utrum in eodem animali sit eadem anima vegetativa et sensitiva
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 136-155. 2023.
    Et arguitur quod non, sed quod sint formae et animae diversae, quia non possumus arguere diversitatem formarum substantialium nisi per diversitatem operationum, cum non ducamur in notitias substantiarum nisi per accidentia et proprietates earum.
  •  16
    Utrum ad videndum colores lumen requiratur propter colorem vel propter medium
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 356-367. 2023.
    Arguitur quod propter colores auctoritate Avempace et eius ratione quia colores generantur secundum aliquam participationem lu- cis vel luminis, licet extincte et obumbrate per opacum.
  •  15
    Utrum definitio animae sit bona qua dicitur anima est actus primus substantialis corporis physici organici habentis vitam in potentia
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 124-135. 2023.
    Arguitur primo quod non, quia absolutum non definitur per relativum, eo quod terminus absolutus non includit in sua ratione aliquem respectivum; et tamen anima est quid absolutum et iste terminus anima est terminus absolutus, isti vero termini actus et potentia sunt termini relativi ad invicem, ut patet nono Metaphysicae.
  •  17
    Utrum sint tantum quinque sensus exteriores
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 504-529. 2023.
    Et arguitur quod sint plures, quia statim dictum est quod duplex est sensus tactus, et praeter illum sunt alii quatuor, scilicet visus, auditus, olfactus, et gustus; igitur sunt sex.
  •  19
    Utrum intellectus humanus sit perpetuus
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 702-717. 2023.
    1. Arguitur quod non, quia sequitur quod homo esset perpetuus, quod est falsum, cum generatur et morietur.
  •  12
    Utrum in organis exterioribus sensuum subiective fiat actualis sensatio vel solum receptio specierum sensibilium et non sensatio nisi in corde
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 610-629. 2023.
    Arguitur quod non fiat actualis sensatio nisi in corde su-biective quia, sicut dicitur in De sensu et sensato, Şdelata ante oculis non sentiunt qui vehementer in aliquid attendunt, ut si in aliquo terribile intendunt timentes,Ť aut in sonos delectabiles.
  •  19
    Utrum sensibile positum supra sensum faciat sensationem, id est, sentiatur
    with Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman, and Jack Zupko
    In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 530-547. 2023.
    Et arguitur primo quod sic, quia quanto agens naturale est propinquius passo, tanto magis potest in ipsum agere. Ideo sensibile immediate superpositum organo sensus magis debet in eo facere suam speciem et sensationem.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback