• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Hans-Christoph Kotzsch

LMU Munich
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    4
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
LMU Munich
Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy
PhD, 2016
München, BY, Germany
Areas of Specialization
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mathematics
  • All publications (4)
  •  6
    Topos semantics for higher-order modal logic
  •  53
    Stefania Centrone, Deborah Kant, and Deniz Sarikaya, eds, Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics: Univalent Foundations, Set Theory, and General Thoughts
    Philosophia Mathematica 30 (1): 88-102. 2022.
    Immanuel KantSet TheoryType Theory in Mathematics
  •  36
    Stefania Centrone, Deborah Kant, and Deniz Sarikaya, eds, Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics: Univalent Foundations, Set Theory, and General Thoughts (review)
    Philosophia Mathematica 30 (1): 88-102. 2022.
    _Stefania Centrone, Deborah Kant_, and _Deniz Sarikaya_, eds, _ Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics: Univalent Foundations, Set Theory, and General Thoughts _. Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science; 407. Springer, 2019. Pp. xxviii + 494. ISBN: 978-3-030-15654-1 ; 978-3-030-15655-8. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15655-8† †.
    Type Theory in Mathematics
  •  102
    Topos Semantics for Higher-Order Modal Logic
    with Steve Awodey and Kohei Kishida
    Logique Et Analyse 228 591-636. 2014.
    We define the notion of a model of higher-order modal logic in an arbitrary elementary topos E. In contrast to the well-known interpretation of higher-order logic, the type of propositions is not interpreted by the subobject classifier ΩE, but rather by a suitable complete Heyting algebra H. The canonical map relating H and ΩE both serves to interpret equality and provides a modal operator on H in the form of a comonad. Examples of such structures arise from surjective geometric morphisms f : F …Read more
    We define the notion of a model of higher-order modal logic in an arbitrary elementary topos E. In contrast to the well-known interpretation of higher-order logic, the type of propositions is not interpreted by the subobject classifier ΩE, but rather by a suitable complete Heyting algebra H. The canonical map relating H and ΩE both serves to interpret equality and provides a modal operator on H in the form of a comonad. Examples of such structures arise from surjective geometric morphisms f : F → E, where H = f∗ΩF. The logic differs from non-modal higher-order logic in that the principles of functional and propositional extensionality are not longer valid but may be replaced by modalized versions. The usual Kripke, neighborhood, and sheaf semantics for propositional and first-order modal logic are subsumed by this notion.
    Category TheoryModal LogicHigher-Order Logic
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback