•  17
    The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms
    with M. Arnold
    Constructivist Foundations 10 (2): 169-176. 2015.
    Context: Although the theory of autopoietic systems was originally formulated to explain the phenomenon of life from an operational and temporal perspective, sociologist Niklas Luhmann incorporated it later within his theory of social systems. Due to this adoption, there have been several discussions regarding the applicability of this concept beyond its biological origins. Problem: This article addresses the conception of Luhman’s autopoietic social systems, and confronts this vision with criti…Read more
  •  15
    The Reality of Ontologies in Luhmann’s Work
    Constructivist Foundations 10 (2): 210-211. 2015.
    Open peer commentary on the article “Ontology, Reality and Construction in Niklas Luhmann’s Theory” by Krzysztof C. Matuszek. Upshot: I discuss the conception of “reality” that Matuszek attributed to Luhmann’s work and the influence of “ontology” on his thought. It is argued that Luhmann’s system theory is based on the distinction system/environment and not on an ontological principle
  •  13
    Authors’ Response: On the Criticisms against the Autopoiesis of Social Systems
    with M. Arnold
    Constructivist Foundations 10 (2): 196-202. 2015.
    Upshot: Firstly, we discuss the main criticisms of our arguments. Secondly, we address the comments and observations on some parts of our article. We conclude with some reflections about the perspectives of the discussion on the autopoiesis concept
  •  11
    Return to Sender? Or Why Messages Never Reach Their Destination
    Constructivist Foundations 12 (1): 45-46. 2016.
    Open peer commentary on the article “Constructivism as a Key Towards Further Understanding of Communication, Culture and Society” by Raivo Palmaru. Upshot: I discuss the solution proposed in the target article to the classic sociological problem of “intersubjectivity,” which is based on the conceptual triad of culture, socialisation and communication. From a constructivist perspective, I argue that Palmaru’s proposal does not advance on this matter.