In this paper, we introduce and study the variety of algebras (A,∧,∨,→,◻,◊,0,1) of type (2,2,2,1,1,0,0) whose {∧,∨,→,0,1}-reduct is a weak Heyting algebra and the following identities are satisfied: (a) ◻1=1, (b) ◻(a∧b)=◻a∧◻b, (c) ◊0=0 and (d) ◊(a∨b)=◊a∨◊b. This variety, which is denoted by MWH, contains several varieties of Heyting algebras with modal operators, which are the algebraic semantics of well-known modal intuitionistic logics. The main goal of this paper is to study certain subvariet…
Read moreIn this paper, we introduce and study the variety of algebras (A,∧,∨,→,◻,◊,0,1) of type (2,2,2,1,1,0,0) whose {∧,∨,→,0,1}-reduct is a weak Heyting algebra and the following identities are satisfied: (a) ◻1=1, (b) ◻(a∧b)=◻a∧◻b, (c) ◊0=0 and (d) ◊(a∨b)=◊a∨◊b. This variety, which is denoted by MWH, contains several varieties of Heyting algebras with modal operators, which are the algebraic semantics of well-known modal intuitionistic logics. The main goal of this paper is to study certain subvarieties of MWH, which are the algebraic semantics of particular subintuitionistic modal logics. We give representation theorems for these subvarieties, we prove that they are canonical and we also show that their associated deductive systems are frame complete with respect to certain class of relational frames.