• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Herbert Morris
(? - 2022)

PhD: University of OxfordLast affiliation: University of California, Los Angeles
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    18
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Department of Philosophy
    Retired faculty
University of Oxford
Faculty of Philosophy
DPhil, 1956
  • All publications (18)
  •  40
    Herbert Morris: UCLA Professor of Law and Philosophy: in commemoration (edited book)
    with George P. Fletcher
    Mazo Publishers. 2023.
    George Fletcher, a foremost scholar in the fields of comparative and international criminal law, was a friend and colleague of Herbert Morris, a renowned scholar and teacher of law and philosophy at the UCLA School of Law. To commemorate and honor the late Herbert Morris, who died in 2022, Fletcher has assembled and edited the selection of essays in this book. Many of the contributors knew Morris on a personal and an academic level. Others only knew of Morris by reputation. The essays fall into …Read more
    George Fletcher, a foremost scholar in the fields of comparative and international criminal law, was a friend and colleague of Herbert Morris, a renowned scholar and teacher of law and philosophy at the UCLA School of Law. To commemorate and honor the late Herbert Morris, who died in 2022, Fletcher has assembled and edited the selection of essays in this book. Many of the contributors knew Morris on a personal and an academic level. Others only knew of Morris by reputation. The essays fall into four categories: Criminal Law and Theory, Personal Reflections, Art and Literary Criticism, and Law and Religion. This commemorative volume reflects Fletcher's respect and admiration for his friend's accomplishments and lifetime achievements. "In two essays, the late Professor Herbert Morris addresses the fundamental issue in criminal law, whether thoughts alone could constitute a basis of criminal liability. The first essay was "Punishment for Thoughts" and the second, "Persons and Punishment". I consider these two of the most important articles ever published on the theory of criminal law." George Fletche.
    Criminal Law
  •  28
    On guilt and innocence
    University of California Press. 1976.
  •  86
    Some further reflections on guilt and punishment
    Law and Philosophy 18 (4): 363-378. 1999.
    Philosophy of Law
  •  1
    On Guilt and Innocence: Essays in Legal Philosophy and Moral Psychology
    University of California Press. 1979.
  • On Guilt and Innocence. Essays in Legal Philosophy and Moral Psychology
    Critica 10 (29): 127-131. 1978.
  •  1
    Guilt and Punishment
    Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2): 305. 1971.
  •  1
    Shared guilt
    In Renford Bambrough (ed.), Wisdom: Twelve Essays, Blackwell. 1974.
    Moral States and Processes
  •  210
    A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment
    American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (4). 1981.
    Ethics
  •  1274
    Persons and punishment
    The Monist 52 (4). 1968.
    Alfredo Traps in Durrenmatt’s tale discovers that he has brought off, all by himself, a murder involving considerable ingenuity. The mock prosecutor in the tale demands the death penalty “as reward for a crime that merits admiration, astonishment, and respect.” Traps is deeply moved; indeed, he is exhilarated, and the whole of his life becomes more heroic, and, ironically, more precious. His defense attorney proceeds to argue that Traps was not only innocent but incapable of guilt, “a victim of …Read more
    Alfredo Traps in Durrenmatt’s tale discovers that he has brought off, all by himself, a murder involving considerable ingenuity. The mock prosecutor in the tale demands the death penalty “as reward for a crime that merits admiration, astonishment, and respect.” Traps is deeply moved; indeed, he is exhilarated, and the whole of his life becomes more heroic, and, ironically, more precious. His defense attorney proceeds to argue that Traps was not only innocent but incapable of guilt, “a victim of the age.” This defense Traps disavows with indignation and anger. He makes claim to the murder as his and demands the prescribed punishment—death.
    Criminal Justice Ethics
  •  159
    Punishment for Thoughts
    The Monist 49 (3): 342-376. 1965.
    Criminal Justice EthicsPunishment in Criminal Law
  •  72
    Imperatives and orders
    Theoria 26 (3): 183-209. 1960.
  •  108
    Murphy on forgiveness
    Criminal Justice Ethics 7 (2): 15-19. 1988.
    ForgivenessCriminal Justice Ethics
  •  55
    Criminal insanity
    Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4): 345-355. 1974.
    Social and Political PhilosophyCriminal Law
  •  74
    Freedom and responsibility: readings in philosophy and law (edited book)
    Stanford University Press. 1961.
    CHAPTER I RESPONSIBILITY "Mother, little heart of mine," he said (he had begun using such strange caressing words at that time), "little heart of mine, ...
    Philosophy of LawCriminal LawMoral Responsibility
  •  84
    Reflections on feeling guilty
    Philosophical Studies 40 (2). 1981.
    Intentionality
  •  101
    The status of rights
    Ethics 92 (1): 40-51. 1981.
    RightsRights and Values
  •  123
    Guilt and suffering
    Philosophy East and West 21 (4): 419-434. 1971.
    Asian PhilosophyMoral States and Processes
  •  199
    The decline of guilt
    Ethics 99 (1): 62-76. 1988.
    Moral States and Processes
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback