-
23Generically Invariant Set TheoryIn Sophia Arbeiter & Juliette Kennedy (eds.), The Philosophy of Penelope Maddy, Springer Verlag. pp. 13-37. 2024.LMV\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mathcal {L}_{MV}$$\end{document} is a sublanguage of the standard language of set theory in which the mathematics based on set-forcing-invariant principles can be carried out, and in which set-forcing-sensitive questions have no obvious formalization. We discuss som…Read more
-
70The covering lemma up to a Woodin cardinalAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic 84 (2): 219-255. 1997.
-
1053Does mathematics need new axiomsBulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4): 401-446. 1999.Part of the ambiguity lies in the various points of view from which this question might be considered. The crudest di erence lies between the point of view of the working mathematician and that of the logician concerned with the foundations of mathematics. Now some of my fellow mathematical logicians might protest this distinction, since they consider themselves to be just more of those \working mathematicians". Certainly, modern logic has established itself as a very respectable branch of mathe…Read more
-
71Inner models with many Woodin cardinalsAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic 65 (2): 185-209. 1993.We extend the theory of “Fine structure and iteration trees” to models having more than one Woodin cardinal
-
492009–2010 Winter Meeting of the Association for Symbolic LogicBulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3): 430-437. 2010.
-
56$K$ without the measurableJournal of Symbolic Logic 78 (3): 708-734. 2013.We show in ZFC that if there is no proper class inner model with a Woodin cardinal, then there is an absolutely definablecore modelthat is close toVin various ways.
-
52Equiconsistencies at subcompact cardinalsArchive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2): 207-238. 2016.We present equiconsistency results at the level of subcompact cardinals. Assuming SBHδ, a special case of the Strategic Branches Hypothesis, we prove that if δ is a Woodin cardinal and both □ and □δ fail, then δ is subcompact in a class inner model. If in addition □ fails, we prove that δ is Π12\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}…Read more
-
105Comparison of fine structural mice via coarse iterationArchive for Mathematical Logic 53 (5-6): 539-559. 2014.Let M\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal{M}}$$\end{document} be a fine structural mouse. Let D\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargi…Read more
-
87Moscone Center West, San Francisco, CA January 15–16, 2010Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3). 2010.
-
221Stacking miceJournal of Symbolic Logic 74 (1): 315-335. 2009.We show that either of the following hypotheses imply that there is an inner model with a proper class of strong cardinals and a proper class of Woodin cardinals. 1) There is a countably closed cardinal k ≥ N₃ such that □k and □(k) fail. 2) There is a cardinal k such that k is weakly compact in the generic extension by Col(k, k⁺). Of special interest is 1) with k = N₃ since it follows from PFA by theorems of Todorcevic and Velickovic. Our main new technical result, which is due to the first auth…Read more
-
135The self-iterability of L[E]Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3): 751-779. 2009.Let L[E] be an iterable tame extender model. We analyze to which extent L[E] knows fragments of its own iteration strategy. Specifically, we prove that inside L[E], for every cardinal K which is not a limit of Woodin cardinals there is some cutpoint t K > a>ω1 are cardinals, then ◊$_{K.\lambda }^* $ holds true, and if in addition λ is regular, then ◊$_{K.\lambda }^* $ holds true
-
180Counterexamples to the Unique and Cofinal Branches HypothesesJournal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3). 2006.We produce counterexamples to the unique and cofinal branches hypotheses, assuming (slightly less than) the existence of a cardinal which is strong past a Woodin cardinal