Jack Zupko (University of Alberta): Publications

More details

University of Alberta
Department of Philosophy

Professor

Cornell University

Sage School of Philosophy

PhD, 1989

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Areas of Specialization

Metaphysics

Philosophy of Religion

Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy

Areas of Interest

Epistemology

Logic and Philosophy of Logic

Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy

196

European and American Philosophers
with John Marenbon, Douglas Kellner, Richard D. Parry, Gregory Schufreider, Ralph McInerny, Andrea Nye, R. M. Dancy, Vernon J. Bourke, A. A. Long, James F. Harris, Thomas Oberdan, Paul S. MacDonald, Véronique M. Fóti, F. Rosen, James Dye, Pete A. Y. Gunter, Lisa J. Downing, W. J. Mander, Peter Simons, Maurice Friedman, Robert C. Solomon, Nigel Love, Mary Pickering, Andrew Reck, Simon J. Evnine, Iakovos Vasiliou, John C. Coker, Georges Dicker, James Gouinlock, Paul J. Welty, Gianluigi Oliveri, Tom Rockmore, Wayne M. Martin, Ladelle McWhorter, Hans-Johann Glock, Georgia Warnke, John Haldane, Joseph S. Ullian, Steven Rieber, David Ingram, Nick Fotion, George Rainbolt, Thomas Sheehan, Gerald J. Massey, Barbara D. Massey, David E. Cooper, David Gauthier, James M. Humber, J. N. Mohanty, Michael H. Dearmey, Oswald O. Schrag, Ralf Meerbote, George J. Stack, John P. Burgess, Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Nicholas Jolley, Adriaan T. Peperzak, E. J. Lowe, William D. Richardson, Stephen Mulhall, and C.

In Robert L. Arrington (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophers, Wiley-blackwell. 2008.

Peter Abelard (1079–1142 ce) was the most wide‐ranging philosopher of the twelfth century. He quickly established himself as a leading teacher of logic in and near Paris shortly after 1100. After his affair with Heloise, and his subsequent castration, Abelard became a monk, but he returned to teaching in the Paris schools until 1140, when his work was condemned by a Church Council at Sens. His logical writings were based around discussion of the “Old Logic”: Porphyry's Isagoge, aristotle'S Categ…Read more
Peter Abelard (1079–1142 ce) was the most wide‐ranging philosopher of the twelfth century. He quickly established himself as a leading teacher of logic in and near Paris shortly after 1100. After his affair with Heloise, and his subsequent castration, Abelard became a monk, but he returned to teaching in the Paris schools until 1140, when his work was condemned by a Church Council at Sens. His logical writings were based around discussion of the “Old Logic”: Porphyry's Isagoge, aristotle'S Categories and On Interpretation and boethius'S textbook on topical inference. They comprise a freestanding Dialectica (“Logic”; probably c.1116), a set of commentaries (known as the Logica [Ingredientibus], c. 1119) and a later (c. 1125) commentary on the Isagoge (Logica Nostrorum Petititoni Sociorum or Glossulae). In a work Abelard called his Theologia, issued in three main versions (between 1120 and c.1134), he attempted a logical analysis of trinitarian relations and explored the philosophical problems surrounding God's claims to omnipotence and omniscience. The Collationes (“Debates,” also known as “Dialogue between a Christian, a Philosopher and a Jew”; probably c.1130) present a rational investigation into the nature of the highest good, in which the Christian and the Philosopher (who seems to be modeled on a philosopher of pagan antiquity) are remarkably in agreement. The unfinished Scito teipsum (“Know thyself,” also known as the “Ethics”; c.1138) analyses moral action.
Thomas of Erfurt
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.
1

John Buridan
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.
12

Utrum organum sensus communis sit in corde vel in cerebro seu in capite; nullus enim alibi ponitur illud organum
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 584-609. 2023.

Arguunt medici quod sit in cerebro et non in corde, auctoritate Galeni, Avicennae, Platonis et plurimorum aliorum, qui dicunt quod est in cerebro in eius anteriori concavitate.
8

Utrum numerus, magnitudo, figura, motus, et quies sint sensibilia communia et per se
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 320-345. 2023.

Utrum numerus, magnitudo, figura, motus, et quies sint sensibilia communia et per se. Arguitur primo de numero quod non, quia dicitur quarto Physicorum quod non potest numerare nisi anima et non quaelibet anima sed intellectiva. Sed non potest numerare non cognoscens numerum secundum rationem secundum quam dicitur numerus.
23

Utrum sensus possit decipi circa sensibile proprium sibi
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 286-305. 2023.

Arguitur quod sic quia intellectus est multo potentioris virtutis et certioris quam sensus, sed ipse potest errare circa obiectum proprium; igitur, magis sensus. Consequentia tenet per locum a minori. Minus enim videtur quod virtus potentior et certior debeat decipi quam potentia vel virtus minus certa.
19

Utrum color sit proprium obiectum visus
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 346-355. 2023.

Arguitur quod sic quia Commentator dicit quod color est visibilis sicut homo est risibilis. Et tamen etiam ponitur communiter quod homo est per se et primo risibilis.
28

Utrum omnis notitia sit de numero bonorum, id est utrum omnis notitia sit bona
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 16-29. 2023.

Arguitur primo quod non, quia dicitur in tertio Metaphysicae quod in mathematica non est bonum neque finis.
23

Utrum universale nihil est aut posterius est
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 52-67. 2023.

Arguitur primo quod universale sit prius singularibus, et magis universale minus universalibus per Porphyrium qui hoc saepe dicit.
17

Utrum ad videndum colores lumen requiratur propter colorem vel propter medium
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 356-367. 2023.

Arguitur quod propter colores auctoritate Avempace et eius ratione quia colores generantur secundum aliquam participationem lu- cis vel luminis, licet extincte et obumbrate per opacum.
28

Utrum sit idem sonus quando ego loquor quem quilibet vestrum audit
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 368-381. 2023.

Arguitur quod non quia, cum Socrates et Plato sint separati secundum locum et situm, non est idem quod pervenit ad aurem So- cratis et ad aurem Platonis.
24

Utrum intellectus humanus possit intelligere plura simul
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 890-907. 2023.

Arguitur quod non, quia dicitur quarto Metaphysicae, Şqui non unum intelligit nihil intelligit,Ť et in Topicis dicitur, Şcontingit plura scire, unum autem solum intelligere.Ť.
10

Utrum omnis intellectio simplex sit vera
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 822-837. 2023.

Et arguitur quod non, quia si omnis conceptus simplex sit verus, sequeretur quod etiam omnis vox significativa correspondens conceptui simplici esset vera, cum non sit vera vel falsa in voce si- gnificativa vel scriptura nisi ratione verae vel falsae in mente.
26

Utrum accidentia magnam partem conferant ad cognoscendum quod quid est
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 68-83. 2023.

Et arguitur primo quod non, quia sequeretur quod esset circulatio in demonstrationibus, quod est contra Aristotelem primo Posteriorum dicentem Şcirculo quoque demonstrare est impossibile.Ť Se queretur etiam quod esset petitio principii, quod est inconveniens.
22

Utrum odor multiplicatur realiter per medium vel spiritualiter seu intentionaliter
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 382-401. 2023.

Arguitur quod sit in medio realiter quia ex quo ipse est in medio, oportet quod sit ibi aliqua res, et hoc est esse realiter.
18

Utrum scientia de anima sit de numero difficillimorum
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 42-51. 2023.

Et arguitur primo quod non, quia Şillud quod per superabundantiam dicitur uni soli convenit,Ť ut dicit Aristoteles in Topicorum; ergo non sunt plura difficillima; ergo nihil est de numero eorum.
20

Circa tertium librum De anima quaeritur primo utrum intellectus humanus sit virtus passiva ab intelligibili
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 632-645. 2023.

Arguitur quod non, quia omne quod patiturmovetur, licet non e converso, ut habetur primo De generatione. Et Şomne quod movetur est divisibile,Ť ut habetur sexto Physicorum. Et intellectus non est divisibilis; ergo nec movetur nec patitur.
42

Utrum tactus sit unus sensus vel plures
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 490-503. 2023.

Arguitur primo quod sit unicus, scilicet in uno homine, quia ex parte animae non est plurificatus, cum sit una anima et indivisibilis. Et similiter ex parte corporis est unus, cum corpus sit unum continuum licet sit divisibile.
26

Utrum naturalissimum operum in viventibus sit generare sibi simile
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 218-237. 2023.

Et arguitur quod non quia operationes magis propriae viventibus sunt eis magis naturales quam aliae. Sed nutritio est viventi ma- gis propria, quia convenit omni viventi et etiam semper per totam vitam et nulli alteri quam viventi convenit.
15

Utrum necesse est ad sentiendum esse sensum agentem
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 266-285. 2023.

Arguitur quod sic quia sicut se habet intellectus ad intelligibilia, sic etiam sensus ad sensibilia, ut habetur tertio huius; et apparet quod sit conveniens proportio; sed ad intelligendum necesse est concurrere intellectum agentem, ut apparet tertio huius; ergo etc.
16

Utrum definitio animae sit bona qua dicitur anima est actus primus substantialis corporis physici organici habentis vitam in potentia
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 124-135. 2023.

Arguitur primo quod non, quia absolutum non definitur per relativum, eo quod terminus absolutus non includit in sua ratione aliquem respectivum; et tamen anima est quid absolutum et iste terminus anima est terminus absolutus, isti vero termini actus et potentia sunt termini relativi ad invicem, ut patet nono Metaphysicae.
27

Utrum intellectus humanus sit forma substantialis corporis humani
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 658-673. 2023.

Arguitur quod sic, per definitionem animae datam in secundo huius quam Aristotelis dicit esse ŞcommunissimamŤ, et per conse- 5 quens ipsa convenit animae intellectivae. Ibi enim dicitur quod anima est Şactus corporisŤ, etc. Idem autem est actus et forma; ergo etc.
14

Utrum oporteat praeter sensum communem ponere alios sensus interiores
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 560-583. 2023.

Arguitur quod sic, quia cum Aristoteles determinasset in secundo huius de sensibus exterioribus et de sensu communi, ipse conse- quenter determinavit de phantasia tamquam de alia virtute.
15

Utrum omnis scientia sit de numero honorabilium
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 30-41. 2023.

Arguitur quod non, quia tunc sequeretur quod omnes scientes deberent honorari. Consequens est falsum.
24

Utrum sint tantum quinque sensus exteriores
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 504-529. 2023.

Et arguitur quod sint plures, quia statim dictum est quod duplex est sensus tactus, et praeter illum sunt alii quatuor, scilicet visus, auditus, olfactus, et gustus; igitur sunt sex.
16

Utrum subiectum proprium in scientia libri De anima sit anima vel ille terminus anima vel corpus animatum vel quoddam aliud aut nihil
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 4-15. 2023.

Et arguitur primo quod sit corpus animatum, quia operationes et passiones hic consideratae sunt compositi ex corpore et anima et non animae sine corpore nec corporis sine anima.
13

Utrum in eodem animali sit eadem anima vegetativa et sensitiva
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 136-155. 2023.

Et arguitur quod non, sed quod sint formae et animae diversae, quia non possumus arguere diversitatem formarum substantialium nisi per diversitatem operationum, cum non ducamur in notitias substantiarum nisi per accidentia et proprietates earum.
16

Should the powers of the soul be distinguished by their acts or objects?
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 174-187. 2023.

And it is argued that they should not be distinguished by their acts, because powers are principles (either active or passive) and so they are naturally prior to their acts, and things that are prior do not have their distinctness from things that are posterior.
19

Utrum necesse sit ad hoc quod homo intelligat concurrere active intellectum agentem, praeter intellectum possibilem
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 782-799. 2023.

Et arguitur quod non, quia Şsicut sensus ad sensibilia,Ť etc. Sed non est dare sensum agentem praeter sensum possibilem, id est receptivum sensationum, cum Aristoteles eum non posuit; igitur, etc.
24

Utrum intellectus humanus sit perpetuus
with Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, and Peter Hartman

In Gyula Klima, Peter G. Sobol, Peter Hartman & Jack Zupko (eds.), John Buridan’s Questions on Aristotle’s De Anima – Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in Aristotelis De Anima, Springer Verlag. pp. 702-717. 2023.

1. Arguitur quod non, quia sequitur quod homo esset perpetuus, quod est falsum, cum generatur et morietur.

Prev.
1
2
3
4
Next

Jack Zupko

Thomas of Erfurt
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.

John Buridan
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.

Jack Zupko

Thomas of Erfurt Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.

John Buridan Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.

Thomas of Erfurt
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.

John Buridan
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002.