Jason Stephens

The study of academic misconduct in higher education spans generations. Reducing the problem among college students remains a top priority among university stakeholders. There are several theoretical explanations for why students cheat, including the institutional climate around academic integrity, motivational achievement goal structures, peer norms, and moral attitudes. These models have rarely been examined in concert to ascertain a more complete picture of the nuances of academic dishonesty. Understanding the interplay between these theoretical explanation(s) would be an important step in developing programming aimed at reducing cheating in higher education. The purpose of this study was toexamine the role of these theoretical explanations in predicting academic cheating as well as a combined model with all constructs. Using a sample of 2,329 undergraduates, we found that all five models were significantly associated with self-reported cheating, but in unique ways depending on the model. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

For anyone concerned about students’ moral development, academic dishonesty presents a pervasive problem but also a promising possibility. The present paper describes the theoretical and empirical underpinnings of process-oriented, four-component model approach to promoting students’ “moral functioning” related to academic integrity, and the research project currently underway that is providing Web-based professional development to teachers for using the model in their high school classrooms. In doing so, we hope to develop a scalable approach that offers teachers an opportunity to be the primary agents of change in transforming the problem of academic dishonesty into a possibility for positive youth development.