The problem that will guide the discussion in this article will be the peculiar relationship between the work and the author, which will lead us to analyze how appropriate it would be to involve, in a philosophical analysis, elements that from the outset would not be part of a philosopher’s “work”, for instance letters, speeches, commentaries. At the same time, this paper considers the relevance of including in a philosophical analysis actions of a political or private nature of the thinker. In …
Read moreThe problem that will guide the discussion in this article will be the peculiar relationship between the work and the author, which will lead us to analyze how appropriate it would be to involve, in a philosophical analysis, elements that from the outset would not be part of a philosopher’s “work”, for instance letters, speeches, commentaries. At the same time, this paper considers the relevance of including in a philosophical analysis actions of a political or private nature of the thinker. In this context, it is worth asking what would give such references a philosophical character, showing the perspectives to be faced by the reader who wants to philosophically approach Heidegger’s thought and his figure.
