-
23From “Just Pricing” to Just “Pricing”Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 111 (4): 522-548. 2025.This paper claims that, while the concept of the just price is still relevant for certain legal and moral practices, the particular conception of the just price present in the Scholastic doctrine of the just price was developed within a theoretical framework that has stopped being relevant for modern economics due to the differences that separate pre-modern (‘Scholastic’) and modern (‘classical’ and ‘neoclassical’) accounts of economic value.
-
24Just Price Theory: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Insights (edited book)Routledge. 2025."This book presents an interdisciplinary approach to just price theory, focusing on the conceptual and normative (moral, legal, and political) implications of the concept of the just price. This volume brings together world-leading experts in the fields of political and legal philosophy to explore the political economy of justice in pricing and socio-legal aspects surrounding the idea of just prices. Divided in two parts, the first set of essays explores the relevance of various normative criter…Read more
-
9George Duke on Aristotle, Politics, and Nomos: Review of George Duke’s Aristotle and Law: The Politics of Nomos: Cambridge University Press, 2020 (review)Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1): 217-221. 2022.
-
92George Duke on Aristotle, Politics, and Nomos: Review of George Duke’s Aristotle and Law: The Politics of NomosCriminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1): 217-221. 2023.
-
97The humanity of private law. Part I: Explanation: by Nicholas J. Mcbride, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2018, pp. 296, £80.00 (Hbk), ISBN 9781509911950Jurisprudence 10 (4): 597-606. 2019.The aim of this review is to comment on two main issues: (i) the critiques that McBride addresses to competing accounts of private law (I claim that they miss the mark) and (ii) the account of human flourishing that McBride sees as underlying English private law, which he calls the ‘RP’ (‘RP’ stands both for ‘reflective picture’ and ‘received picture’ of human flourishing). I raise some worries about the nature and content of the RP as explained by McBride.
Joaquín Reyes
University of Edinburgh
Universidad Finis Terrae
-
-
Universidad Finis TerraeInvestigador Externo
Bridge, Kent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland