• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

John H. Boyer

Loyola University, New OrleansUniversity of St. Thomas, Texas
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    3
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
  • Loyola University, New Orleans
    Department of Philosophy
    Visiting Assistant Professor
  • University of St. Thomas, Texas
    Department of Philosophy
    Doctoral student
CV
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Aristotle
Thomas Aquinas
Medieval Philosophy of Nature
Aristotle: Natural Science
Aristotle: Causation
Causal Accounts of Explanation
1 more
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion
Thomas Aquinas
Theories of Explanation
Medieval Philosophy of Nature
Aristotle: Logic and Philosophy of Language
Aristotle: Metaphysics
Aristotle: Natural Science
Aristotle: Time
Aristotle: Causation
Aristotle
Causal Accounts of Explanation
Explanation
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
Philosophy of Physical Science
General Philosophy of Science
Metaphysics and Epistemology
Theories of Causation
Causal Realism
Aristotle: Physics
16 more
  • All publications (3)
  •  160
    Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas on What is “Better-Known” in Natural Science
    with Daniel C. Wagner
    Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 93 199-225. 2019.
    Aristotelian commenters have long noted an apparent contradiction between what Aristotle says in Posterior Analytics I.2 and Physics I.1 about how we obtain first principles of a science. At Posterior 71b35–72a6, Aristotle states that what is most universal (καθόλου) is better-known by nature and initially less-known to us, while the particular (καθ’ ἕκαστον) is initially better-known to us, but less-known by nature. At Physics 184a21-30, however, Aristotle states that we move from what is bette…Read more
    Aristotelian commenters have long noted an apparent contradiction between what Aristotle says in Posterior Analytics I.2 and Physics I.1 about how we obtain first principles of a science. At Posterior 71b35–72a6, Aristotle states that what is most universal (καθόλου) is better-known by nature and initially less-known to us, while the particular (καθ’ ἕκαστον) is initially better-known to us, but less-known by nature. At Physics 184a21-30, however, Aristotle states that we move from what is better-known to us, which is universal (καθόλου), to what is better-known absolutely, which is particular (καθ’ ἕκαστον). This paper turns to two of Aristotle’s most notable medieval commentators—Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas—to resolve this apparent contradiction. The key to Thomas and Albert’s solutions, we will argue, is a twofold distinction between a sense-perceptive and scientific universal, and the particulars as sensed individuals and as differentiating attributes. Our Synthetic treatment of these distinctions contributes to the ongoing scholarly effort to understand the Stagyrite’s complex theory of knowledge.
    Aristotle: Posterior AnalyticsAristotle: Philosophy of Science, MiscAristotle: Natural Science, MiscRead more
    Aristotle: Posterior AnalyticsAristotle: Philosophy of Science, MiscAristotle: Natural Science, MiscAquinas: Natural ScienceAristotle: PrinciplesAristotle: PhysicsAristotle: Epistemology, MiscMedieval Philosophy of NatureAquinas: Epistemology
  •  1963
    Eternal God: Divine Atemporality in Thomas Aquinas
    In Darci N. Hill (ed.), News from the Raven: Essays from Sam Houston State University on Medieval and Renaissance Thought, Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 262-285. 2014.
    The recent trend among many philosophers of religion has been to interpret divine eternity as an everlasting temporality in which an omnitemporal God exists in and throughout the whole of time. This is in contrast to the classical account of divine eternity as atemporal, immutable existence. In this paper, Aquinas' use of Boethius's definition of eternity as “the whole, perfect, and simultaneous possession of endless life” is analyzed and explained in contradistinction to Aristotle's definition …Read more
    The recent trend among many philosophers of religion has been to interpret divine eternity as an everlasting temporality in which an omnitemporal God exists in and throughout the whole of time. This is in contrast to the classical account of divine eternity as atemporal, immutable existence. In this paper, Aquinas' use of Boethius's definition of eternity as “the whole, perfect, and simultaneous possession of endless life” is analyzed and explained in contradistinction to Aristotle's definition of time. This analysis is then used to respond to Nicholas Wolterstroff's argument in "God Everlasting" that God's knowledge of temporal events infects God with temporality and mutability. The argument concludes by introducing an important distinction between absolute simultaneity and temporal simultaneity, which allows us to hold God is omniscient because he is absolutely simultaneous with all events but is not temporally simultaneous with any event.
    Time and ChangeA-Theories of TimeDivine OmniscienceDivine EternityTemporal ExpressionsExperience of …Read more
    Time and ChangeA-Theories of TimeDivine OmniscienceDivine EternityTemporal ExpressionsExperience of Temporal PassageB-Theories of Time
  •  1331
    Thomas Aquinas: Teacher of Transhumanity?
    with Geoffrey Meadows
    In John Hittinger & Daniel C. Wagner (eds.), Thomas Aquinas: Teacher of Humanity, Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 176-187. 2015.
    Essentialism about SpeciesTranshumanismBiological EnhancementCognitive EnhancementThomas Aquinas
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback