-
4García Carpintero & Kölbel, Relative TruthTheoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 24 (3): 360-363. 2010.
-
36Singular Terms in Fiction. Fictional and “Real” Names (III Blasco Disputatio)Disputatio 11 (54): 111-142. 2019.In this introduction, I consider different problems posed by the use of singular terms in fiction (section 1), paying especial attention to proper names and, in particular, to names of real people, places, etc. As we will see (section 2), descriptivist and Millian theories of reference face different kinds of problems in explaining the use of fictional names in fiction-related contexts. Moreover, the task of advancing a uniform account of names in these contexts—an account which deals not only w…Read more
-
16Les paradoxes i la filosofia: tres visions contemporàniesQuaderns de Filosofia 2 (2): 57-88. 2015.A paradox is usually described as an apparently false statement supported by an apparently good argument which departs from premises that most people would find trivially true. This survey article presents a brief overview of three different contemporary perspectives on paradoxes. According to the epistemic view, paradoxes play a crucial role in the progress of science and cannot be regarded as sound proofs of a false statement. According to the dialetheist view, the conclusion of some paradoxic…Read more
-
50Eliminating Self-Reference from Grelling’s and Zwicker’s ParadoxesTheoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (1): 85-97. 2014.The goal of this paper is to present Yabloesque versions of Grelling’s and Zwicker’s paradoxes concerning the notions of “heterological” and “hypergame” respectively. We will offer counterparts of these paradoxes that do not seem to involve self-reference or vicious circularity.El objetivo de este artículo es ofrecer versiones de las paradojas de Grelling (sobre el predicado “heterológico”) y de Zwicker (sobre el hiperjuego) inspiradas en la paradoja de Yablo. Nuestras versiones de estas paradoj…Read more
-
35Eliminating Self-Reference from Grelling’s and Zwicker’s ParadoxesTheoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (1): 85. 2014.The goal of this paper is to present Yabloesque versions of Grelling’s and Zwicker’s paradoxes concerning the notions of “heterological” and “hypergame” respectively. We will offer counterparts of these paradoxes that do not seem to involve self-reference or vicious circularity.El objetivo de este artículo es ofrecer versiones de las paradojas de Grelling y de Zwicker inspiradas en la paradoja de Yablo. Nuestras versiones de estas paradojas no parecen involucrar ni autorreferencia ni circularida…Read more
-
60Empiricism and experience : Two problemsInternational Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2). 2009.No abstract
-
80A Failed "Cassatio": Goldstein on the LiarProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3). 2009.
-
212The inclosure scheme and the solution to the paradoxes of self-referenceSynthese 160 (2). 2008.All paradoxes of self-reference seem to share some structural features. Russell in 1908 and especially Priest nowadays have advanced structural descriptions that successfully identify necessary conditions for having a paradox of this kind. I examine in this paper Priest’s description of these paradoxes, the Inclosure Scheme (IS), and consider in what sense it may help us understand and solve the problems they pose. However, I also consider the limitations of this kind of structural descriptions …Read more
-
47Relative Truth (review)Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 24 (3): 358-361. 2009.Review: M. GARCÍA-CARPINTERO & M. KÖLBEL (eds.), Relative Truth. London: Oxford University Press, 2008.
-
27The goal of this paper is to present Yabloesque versions of Grelling’s and Zwicker’s paradoxes concerning the notions of “heterological” and “hypergame” respectively. We will offer counterparts of these paradoxes that do not seem to involve any kind of self-reference or vicious circularity.