-
357This manuscript explores Bernard Williams' discussion of the nature of genealogy. Also, I attempt to reconstruct his genealogy of the morality system.
-
427バーナード・ウィリアムズの功利主義批判再考 (Bernard Williams’ Critique of Utilitarianism Reconsidered)Japanese Student Research Notes of Philosophy of Science 4 17-25. 2021.This research discusses Bernard Williams' critique of utilitarianism. I will address Williams' well-known “Integrity Objection” and clarify where his main issue with utilitarianism lies. Through this, I will demonstrate that the separation of the two viewpoints – the “inside viewpoint” and the “impartial viewpoint” - is the issue, as the utilitarian impartial viewpoint does not capture the value of ethical deliberations based on our inside viewpoint in which we presuppose our personal projects. …Read more
-
763疎外された倫理:バーナード・ウィリアムズの道徳批判 (Alienated Ethics: Bernard Williams' Critique of the Morality System)Gate of Philosophy : Journal for Graduate Students 3 180-194. 2021.In this paper, I will examine Bernard Williams' critique of the Morality System and defend it from a repeated objection by showing my reading of Williams. According to this reading, the Morality System is an alienated ethics: it has certain idiosyncrasies which ordinary ethics lacks.
-
548Kaneko Fumiko (1903-1926)In Revolutionary Women (2nd Edition), Anarchist Federation. forthcoming.Fumiko Kaneko was a female anarchist philosopher born in Japan in 1903. With her Korean partner Pak Yol, she founded the anarchist collective “Futei-sha” which published many articles arguing for anarchism and direct action (“Futei-sha” is named after “Futei-Senjin”, a government term for malcontent Koreans). Both Fumiko and Pak were pre-emptively detained during the major earthquake in 1923. During the detention, they testified that they had plotted to bomb the emperor’s son, which resulted in …Read more
-
33Regret and Necessity: Bernard Williams' Critique of the Free Will DebatePense University of Edinburgh Philosophy Society Journal 2 23-31. 2021.In this paper, I will present the responsibility-compatibilist argument against responsibility-incompatibilists (hard-determinists and libertarians), according to whom the existence of ‘free-will’, threatened by determinism, is necessary for moral responsibility. First, I will identify what responsibility-incompatibilism presupposes as necessary conditions of moral responsibility: the Strong Doctrine of Free-Will and the Voluntary Control Principle. Second, inspired by Williams, I will demonstra…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Normative Ethics |
Moral Phenomena |
Moral Psychology |
Areas of Interest
Normative Ethics |
Moral Phenomena |
Moral Psychology |