Kevin MacDonald

Fashion Institute of Technology
  •  14
    MacDonald develops an evolutionary perspective on Judaism. Judaism is conceptualized as a group evolutionary strategy characterized by a high degree of endogamy and resistance to genetic and cultural assimilation. Data are provided to support the author's theory that Judaism is characterized by a high level of within-group altruism and competition with outgroups. Finally, MacDonald argues that Judaism has been characterized by eugenic practices aimed at high intelligence and high investment pare…Read more
  •  29
    Variation in mating dispositions
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4): 609-610. 2000.
    This commentary focuses on the omission of genetic and environmental variation in several competing evolved motive dispositions that not only react to different environmental contexts but also result in people structuring contexts to obtain psychological rewards. Cross-cultural research is poor evidence for alternate strategies because natural selection may operate to produce geographical variation in dispositional tendencies. Finally, I defend a traditional concept of plasticity in opposition t…Read more
  •  28
    The fate of heritability in the postgenomic era
    with Peter J. LaFreniere
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5): 370-371. 2012.
    This commentary argues that age changes in heritability are incompatible with Charney's theory. The new genetics must be tempered by the findings that many epigenetic phenomena are random and are linked to pathology, thus making them peripheral to the design of complex adaptations. Behavior-genetic findings are compatible with strong maternal effects; G E interactions are unlikely to be an important aspect of normal development
  •  49
    Group evolutionary strategies: Dimensions and mechanisms
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4): 629-630. 1994.
  •  55
    G and Darwinian algorithms
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5): 685-686. 2000.
    Stanovich & West's assumption of discrete System 1 and System 2 mechanisms is questionable. System 2 can be understood as emerging from individuals who score high on several normally distributed cognitive mechanisms supporting System 1. Cognitions ascribed to System 1 and System 2 appear to be directed toward the same evolutionary significant goals, and thus are likely to have emerged from the same selection pressures.
  •  14
    Reinventing the wheel on structuring groups, with an inadequate psychology
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3): 263-264. 2014.