Did you know that free-will philosophers regularly conflate relations which are as different in kind as spurious correlation and causation? Did you know that this has led philosophers (even in x-phi) to engage in fallacious cum hoc ergo propter hoc reasoning and sophistical motte-and-baileying? It has also led to widespread confusion about the logical structures and conclusions of the most famous arguments in the debate--e.g. philosophers have normalized the mistaken narrative that the Consequence Argument, the Zygote Argument, the Four-Case Argument, and the Basic Argument aim to support the same conclusion. Would you like to know more abo…

Read more