• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Lauri Karttunen

Stanford University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    5
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    3

 More details
  • Stanford University
    Regular Faculty
Stanford, California, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Language
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
  • All publications (5)
  •  258
    Lauri Karttunen and Stanley Peters. Conventional implicature. Syntax and semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition, edited by Choon-Kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, and London, 1979, pp. 1–56. - Gerald Gazdar. A solution to the projection problem. Syntax and semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition, edited by Choon-Kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, and London, 1979, pp. 57–89. - Janet Dean Fodor. In defense of the truth value gap. Syntax and semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition, edited by Choon-Kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, and London, 1979, pp. 199–224. - Ruth M. Kempson. Presupposition, opacity, and ambiguity. Syntax and semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition, edited by Choon-Kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, and London, 1979, pp. 283–297. - S. K. Thomason. Truth-value gaps, many truth values, and possible worlds. Syntax and semantics, Volume 11, P
    with Stanley Peters, Choon-kyu Oh, David A. Dinneen, Gerald Gazdar, and Janet Dean Fodor
    Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (2): 412-415. 1981.
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic
  •  403
    Syntax and semantics of questions
    Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1): 3--44. 1977.
    W. Labov's & T. Labov's findings concerning their child grammar acquisition ("Learning the Syntax of Questions" in Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language, Campbell, R. & Smith, P. Eds, New York: Plenum Press, 1978) are interpreted in terms of different semantics of why & other wh-questions. Z. Dubiel
    MeaningSemanticsQuestionsErotetic Logic
  •  27
    What do referential indices refer to?
    Rand Corp.]. 1968.
    An examination is made of the proposal that in the deep structure, noun phrases are associated with a referential index. The purpose of this proposal was not so much to account for the meaning of sentences but to augment the notion of noun phrase identity which was needed for the structural description of certain deletion transformations. This paper attempts to study how and if such markers could be used in semantics. The outcome of that kind of study will ultimately decide what the future of in…Read more
    An examination is made of the proposal that in the deep structure, noun phrases are associated with a referential index. The purpose of this proposal was not so much to account for the meaning of sentences but to augment the notion of noun phrase identity which was needed for the structural description of certain deletion transformations. This paper attempts to study how and if such markers could be used in semantics. The outcome of that kind of study will ultimately decide what the future of indices will be. (Author).
    Aspects of ReferenceSemantics
  •  53
    Definite Descriptions with Crossing Coreference: A Study of the Bach-Peters Paradox
    Foundations of Language 7 (2): 157-182. 1971.
    Semantics
  •  5
    Discourse Referents
    In J. D. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Vol., Academic Press. pp. 363--386. 1976.
    Semantics
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback