-
147The Medieval Tradition of Seneca's DialoguesClassical Quarterly 18 (2): 355-372. 1968.The manuscript tradition of Seneca'sDialoguesconsists of one eleventhcentury manuscript, Ambrosianus C 90 inf., which is the main source for the text, and a ruck of later manuscripts of lesser and disputed worth. There are over a hundred of these, far more than has been supposed.
-
89Senega's Dialogues Francesco Giancotti: Cronologia dei 'Dialoghi' di Seneca. Pp. 453. Turin: Loescher, 1957. Paper, L. 3,200 (review)The Classical Review 8 (3-4): 258-260. 1958.
-
191Michele Coccia: I problemi del 'De Ira' di Seneca alla luce dell'analisi stilistica. Pp. 157. Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo, 1958. Paper, L. 1,600 (review)The Classical Review 10 (02): 171-172. 1960.
-
90Some Notes on the Text of Seneca's DialoguesClassical Quarterly 24 (02): 269-. 1974.1. 4. 9. Fugite delicias, fugite enervantem felicitatem, qua animi permadescunt et, nisi aliquid intervenit quod humanae sortis admoneat, †velut perpetua ebrietate sopitif†. Although it is possible to produce a tolerable sentence by deleting et after permadescunt, it is generally agreed that a verb is missing in the last clause. Koch suggested sopiti, Gertz sopiti
-
89Cicero De Finibus Bonorum et MalorumClarendon Press. 1998.Cicero's De finibus, written in 45 BC, consists of three separate dialogues, dealing respectively with the ethical systems of Epicureanism, Stoicism, and the `Old Academy' of Antiochus of Ascalon. This critical edition of the text, based on a fresh study and collation of the manuscripts, is the first to appear for many years and the first to reflect a clear understanding of the whole manuscript tradition. It will be the second in a series of editions of Cicero's philosophical works; the first vo…Read more
-
Texas A&M UniversityResearcher
College Station, Texas, United States of America