• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Leszek Skowronski

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    7
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    7

 More details
Areas of Interest
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Meta-Ethics
  • All publications (7)
  • Zarzut systematycznego błędu interpretacyjnego w tłumaczeniu Etyki nikomachejskiej
    Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 61. 2007.
  • On the Different Understandings of the History of Philosophy
    Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 59. 2014.
  • An Embarrassing Side of the Master of Common Sense or About Different Ways of Reading Aristotle’s Ethics
    Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 54. 2009.
    This article argues against the popular image of Aristotle as a common-sense philosopher, an image built by opposing him to Plato. In the first part, there is a short survey of ways in which some modern commentators try to ignore passages of Aristotle’s texts which do not fit into supposedly Aristotelian down-to-earth view of human life. The second part presents an example of a philosopher who brings these suppressed fragments to the fore and sees in them the essence of Aristotle’s writings on t…Read more
    This article argues against the popular image of Aristotle as a common-sense philosopher, an image built by opposing him to Plato. In the first part, there is a short survey of ways in which some modern commentators try to ignore passages of Aristotle’s texts which do not fit into supposedly Aristotelian down-to-earth view of human life. The second part presents an example of a philosopher who brings these suppressed fragments to the fore and sees in them the essence of Aristotle’s writings on the human good
    Classical Greek Philosophy
  • Why is a New Polish Translation of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Necessary?
    Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 56. 2011.
    The main reason is that the present translation contains serious errors. The most important error concerns the conclusion of the treatise. In the present Polish translation the conclusion contradicts that of the original. The first part of this article explains why the translation is wrong and suggests the reason the mistake was made and the reason that it was not noticed for more than half a century. The second part presents the views of commentators criticising the traditional way of interpret…Read more
    The main reason is that the present translation contains serious errors. The most important error concerns the conclusion of the treatise. In the present Polish translation the conclusion contradicts that of the original. The first part of this article explains why the translation is wrong and suggests the reason the mistake was made and the reason that it was not noticed for more than half a century. The second part presents the views of commentators criticising the traditional way of interpreting Aristotle’s text. This kind of interpretation leads to a distortion of meaning of the original and the Polish translation is an example of an extreme case of such distortion
    Aristotle's Works
  • Dlaczego konieczne jest nowe polskie tłumaczenie Etyki nikomachejskiej Arystotelesa?
    Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 56. 2011.
  • Wstydliwe strony mistrza zdrowego rozsądku, czyli o rożnych sposobach odczytywania Etyk Arystotelesa
    Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 54. 2009.
  • Jaki sens ma „dobro” w księdze I Etyki nikomachejskiej?
    Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 61. 2007.
    European Philosophy
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback