Liesbet Vanhaute

In _Towards Perpetual Peace_ Kant praises the beneficial effects of commerce, conjecturing that it may contribute to peace. But will a market economy _inevitably_ bring about prosperity and peace or could it occasion commercial exploitation? Despite his positive overall evaluation, Kant presents a critique of contemporary trading companies’ often exploitative colonialist and imperialist practices. He acknowledges the existence of objectionable forms of international commerce. His remarks in _Towards Perpetual Peace_ thus presuppose a normative theory of international migration and commerce. This chapter makes this theory more explicit by outlining colonialist practices Kant condemns and exploring the forms of legitimate trade and settlement he entertains. The role of contracts is crucial to Kant’s conception of legitimate trade and settlement. But how consistent with his general philosophy of right is this? And what are the implications of possible consistency breaches for the prospect of transforming illegitimate trading practices into legitimate ones?

Whereas in Idea for a Universal History Kant without much hesitation resorts to biological concepts to understand history, this fundamentally changes in Critique of the Power of Judgment. In this work, history and biology are separated; they are understood as two different forms of teleological judgments. The teleological concepts that make history intelligible are divorced from their biological origins and introduced in an explicitly non-biological way of thinking. I argue that because of this shift, after the Critique of the Power of Judgment Kant’s theory of history cannot any longer function as an independent confirmation of the possibility of human morality. Während es Kant in seiner Schrift Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht für unproblematisch erachtet, biologische Konzepte auf die Geschichte anzuwenden, steht er diesem Unterfangen in der Kritik der Urteilskraft kritisch gegenüber. In seiner dritten Kritik trennt Kant Geschichte und Biologie: In ihnen treten jetzt unterschiedliche Formen teleologischer Urteile auf. Die teleologischen Konzepte, welche die Geschichte verständlich machen, werden von ihrer biologischen Herkunft getrennt und in einer explizit nicht-biologischen Weise eingeführt. Wie ich argumentiere, kann Kants Theorie der Geschichte aufgrund dieser Verschiebung nicht länger als unabhängige Bestätigung der Möglichkeit menschlicher Sittlichkeit herangezogen werden

I won’t, but my colleague will: referral as a solution for conscientious objections in the workplace A policy of ‘refusing and referring’ allows conscientious objectors to refrain from the action they object to, as long as they can refer to a willing colleague. This policy is often presented as a pragmatic solution to the problem of conscientious objection in the workplace. In this paper, I reflect on the merits and the shortcomings of this strategy. I will analyse the current situation in Belgium and in the Netherlands (section 2), where ‘refusal and referral’ is a preferred way to deal with conscientious objections. This context serves as a touchstone for arguments about conscientious objection in the workplace. Contrary to those authors that dismiss it as merely pragmatic, I argue that referral responds to value conflicts that are unavoidable in pluralistic liberal democracies (section 3). And contrary to those who criticize it as a tactical, non-moral compromise, I argue in section 4 that it is in some cases pervaded by moral values like respect for others. Finally, in section 5 I show that referral does not necessarily clash with professional values, but that it can be problematic when it confirms patterns of discrimination.