Louise Daoust

In recent decades, and with the rise of the biological sciences, the color literature especially has taken seriously evidence from ethology and comparative psychology. However, there has been significantly less discussion of comparative cases in other areas of philosophy of perception. This essay aims to bring insights from animal studies into dialogue with more traditional ways of thinking about the perception of size. It argues that an indexing approach to perceptual representation, pioneered by Prettyman (Perceptual content is indexed to attention. Synthese, 194(10), 4039–4054, 2017) in response to evidence of attentional effects in perception, cannot fully address the challenge.

Theories of perception are at the core of many of the most renowned seventeenth and eighteenth century European philosophical systems. Work on perception is less common in the writings of women philosophers of this period, and yet, like their male peers, early modern women philosophers are responsible for innovative accounts of our perceptual relation with the natural world. With special attention to the work of Margaret Cavendish and Mary Shepherd, this essay explores some notable features of theories of perception developed by women between the mid-seventeenth and the early nineteenth centuries with the aim of elucidating how women’s contributions to this cardinal area of early modern study expanded the diversity of views on offer.

Shepherd defends an account of the universe founded on two causal principles: that effects necessarily have causes, and that like causes have like effects. Folding mind into the class of natural phenomena governed by these principles, Shepherd naturalizes the mind, but in doing so she sets herself the challenge of explaining how, within a deterministic universe, agents can be necessary causes of their own actions. With special attention to Shepherd’s resistance to materialism and to any reduction of the mental, the paper argues that we can read Shepherd as leveraging her original theory of causation to develop a distinctive compatibilist view of the psychology of intention, one that makes agents the necessary causal sources of their own actions. Published on 2022-10-28 10:36:44.

On Mary Shepherd's view of our perception of the external world, perceived qualities are "as a landscape, sent from an unseen country by which we may know it". Originally published in 1827, Shepherd's Essays on the Perception of an External Universe made important contributions in epistemology and the philosophy of perception, among other areas. In Antonia LoLordo's much-anticipated new edition of the text, advanced undergraduate students and scholars alike will find an inviting and authoritative introduction to Shepherd's work, followed by a modernized and annotated copy of the text. LoLordo's is the first modern edition of Shepherd's EPEU. Inexpensive...

Do the physical facts of the viewed environment account for the ordinary experiences we have of that environment? According to standard philosophical views, distal facts do account for our experiences, a phenomenon explained by appeal to perceptual constancy, the phenomenal stability of objects and environmental properties notwithstanding physical changes in proximal stimulation. This essay reviews a significant but neglected research tradition in experimental psychology according to which percepts systematically do not correspond to mind-independent distal facts. Instead, stability of percept values comes in degrees, and physical facts about the viewed environment alone do not account for our ordinary experiences of the world. I conclude that more attention to descriptive research in psychophysics is warranted if what is sought is a philosophical theory of the nature of our perceptual relation with the world.