•  5
    Descartes’s Embodied Minds
    Apuntes Filosóficos 28 (54): 11-26. 2019.
    Descartes's philosophy of mind does not reduce to the mind-body dualism of his Meditations. Indeed, we can find a certain theory of consciousness scattered throughout his writings; though the term „consciousness‟, understood as phenomenal consciousness, is not part of his vocabulary. His dualistic ontology is a consequence of the conceptual limitations and the metaphysical preconceptions of his time. However, Descartes‟s theory of perception, his concept of „mind‟, his theory of ideas, and his t…Read more
  •  128
    Sobre la naturaleza de los conceptos básicos en Jackson y Strawson
    Apuntes Filosóficos 26 (50): 71-89. 2017.
    El objetivo del presente ensayo es el de examinar las características de los tipos de análisis conceptual propuestos por Jackson en From Metaphysics to Ethics y de Strawson en Análisis y Metafísica. Se quieren confrontar dos tipos de análisis conceptual: Por una parte, se pretende aclarar algunos aspectos característicos del tipo de análisis conceptual propuesto por cada autor, desde el punto de vista metodológico, y, por otra, caracterizar la naturaleza de lo que cada uno considera como concept…Read more
  •  17
    ¿Está presente el problema de las otras mentes en la filosofía de R. Descartes?
    Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología En Historia de Las Ideas 11 47-56. 2017.
    The aim of the essay is to analyze the passages of the Cartesian oeuvre which could be related to the problem of other minds. After a brief presentation of the problem and what is known as the argument from analogy, we show that what we will call the automata passage is not an acknowledgement of the problem. Next, we raise a way of generating the problem, to show how it could be approached from Descartes’s works.
  •  14
    ¿Está presente el problema de las otras mentes en la filosofía de R. Descartes?
    Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología En Historia de la Ideas 11 47-56. 2017.
    The aim of the essay is to analyze the passages of the Cartesian oeuvre which could be related to the problem of other minds. After a brief presentation of the problem and what is known as the argument from analogy, we show that what we will call the automata passage is not an acknowledgement of the problem. Next, we raise a way of generating the problem, to show how it could be approached from Descartes’s works.