•  19
    The Ethics of Free Soloing
    In Fritz Allhoff & Stephen E. Schmid (eds.), Climbing ‐ Philosophy for Everyone, Wiley‐blackwell. 2010-09-24.
    This chapter contains sections titled: What is Free Soloing? Why Do People Free Solo? Not Anyone Else's Business! What Free Soloing Will Do to You A Matter of Consequences? So, Should I Do It? Notes.
  •  30
    On Disjunctive Rights
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (2): 141-157. 2017.
    This article examines the idea of disjunctive rights—an idea first suggested by Joel Feinberg and more recently advocated by Richard Arneson. Using a hypothetical scenario to bring forward a conflict between two rights that cannot be simultaneously fulfilled, the suggestion that the conflict can be solved by describing the right-holders as holding disjunctive rights—rights that involve, in a significant way, a disjunction—is scrutinized. Several interpretations of the idea of disjunctive rights …Read more
  •  20
    David Sobel has recently argued that libertarian theories that accept full and strict self-ownership as foundational confront what he calls the conflation problem: if transgressing self-ownership is strictly and stringently forbidden, it is implied that the normative protection against one infringement is precisely as strong as against any other infringement. But this seems to be an absurd consequence. In defense of libertarianism, I argue that the conflation problem can be handled in a way that…Read more
  •  116
    The harm argument against surrogacy revisited: two versions not to forget
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (3): 357-363. 2014.
    It has been a common claim that surrogacy is morally problematic since it involves harm to the child or the surrogate—the harm argument. Due to a growing body of empirical research, the harm argument has seen a decrease in popularity, as there seems to be little evidence of harmful consequences of surrogacy. In this article, two revised versions of the harm argument are developed. It is argued that the two suggested versions of the harm argument survive the current criticism against the standard…Read more
  •  42
    When Do We Share Moral Norms?
    Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (3): 303-315. 2012.
    Descriptive universalism.
  •  78
    Reassessing Walzer’s social criticism
    Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9): 917-937. 2012.
    It is often argued that Michael Walzer’s theory of social criticism, which underpins his theory of justice, is not much of a theory at all, but rather an impressionistic collection of historical anecdotes. Contrary to this perception, I argue that Walzer’s method can be accurately described as a version of John Rawls’ well-known method of wide reflective equilibrium. Through a systematic comparison it can be shown that the two methods are strikingly similar. This implies that, far from the criti…Read more
  •  56
    The relationship between libertarianism and state is a contested one. Despite pressing full and strict ownership of one’s person and any justly acquired goods, many libertarians have suggested ways in which a state, albeit limited, can be regarded as just. Peter Vallentyne has proposed that all plausible versions of libertarianism are compatible with what he calls ‘private-law states’. His proposal is underpinned by a particular conception of rights, which brings Interest Theory of rights and Wi…Read more
  •  51
    A Critical Comment on Collste
    Public Health Ethics 4 (2): 203-205. 2011.
    This article claims that the account of specification as a way to solve conflicts between rights, suggested by Göran Collste, is unsatisfactory. It is argued that specification is not a solution on its own, but is better described as a remedy in response to a political failure