-
101Network analyses in systems biology: new strategies for dealing with biological complexitySynthese 195 (4): 1751-1777. 2018.The increasing application of network models to interpret biological systems raises a number of important methodological and epistemological questions. What novel insights can network analysis provide in biology? Are network approaches an extension of or in conflict with mechanistic research strategies? When and how can network and mechanistic approaches interact in productive ways? In this paper we address these questions by focusing on how biological networks are represented and analyzed in a …Read more
-
74What can polysemy tell us about theories of explanation?European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1): 41-56. 2017.Philosophical accounts of scientific explanation are broadly divided into ontic and epistemic views. This paper explores the idea that the lexical ambiguity of the verb to explain and its nominalisation supports an ontic conception of explanation (Salmon 1989; Craver 2007). I analyse one argument which challenges this strategy by criticising the claim that explanatory talk is lexically ambiguous (Wright, European Journal of Philosophy of Science 2(3), 375–394, 2012). I propose that the linguisti…Read more
-
87Why the Small Things in Life Matter: Philosophy of Biology from the Microbial PerspectiveMaureen A. O’Malley, Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , x+269 pp., $30.39 (review)Philosophy of Science 83 (1): 152-158. 2016.
-
15Philosophical Perspectives on the Engineering Approach in Biology: Living Machines? (edited book)Routledge. 2020.Philosophical Perspectives on the Engineering Approach in Biology provides a philosophical examination of what has been called the most powerful metaphor in biology: The machine metaphor. The chapters collected in this volume discuss the idea that living systems can be understood through the lens of engineering methods and machine metaphors from both historical, theoretical, and practical perspectives. In their contributions the authors examine questions about scientific explanation and methodol…Read more
-
32Turing Patterns and Biological ExplanationDisputatio 9 (47): 529-552. 2017.Turing patterns are a class of minimal mathematical models that have been used to discover and conceptualize certain abstract features of early biological development. This paper examines a range of these minimal models in order to articulate and elaborate a philosophical analysis of their epistemic uses. It is argued that minimal mathematical models aid in structuring the epistemic practices of biology by providing precise descriptions of the quantitative relations between various features of t…Read more
-
106Constitutive Relevance in Interlevel ExperimentsBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2): 697-725. 2020.One reason for the popularity of Craver’s mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance is that it seems to make good sense of the experimental practices and constitutive reasoning in the life sciences. Two recent papers propose a theoretical alternative to in light of several important conceptual objections. Their alternative approach, the no de-coupling account, conceives of constitution as a dependence relation that once postulated provides the best explanation of the impossibility …Read more
-
92The scope and limits of a mechanistic view of computational explanationSynthese 192 (10): 3371-3396. 2015.An increasing number of philosophers have promoted the idea that mechanism provides a fruitful framework for thinking about the explanatory contributions of computational approaches in cognitive neuroscience. For instance, Piccinini and Bahar :453–488, 2013) have recently argued that neural computation constitutes a sui generis category of physical computation which can play a genuine explanatory role in the context of investigating neural and cognitive processes. The core of their proposal is t…Read more
-
23Structural Representations and the Explanatory ConstraintCroatian Journal of Philosophy 13 (2): 277-291. 2013.My aim in this paper is to investigate what epistemic role, if any, do appeals to representations play in cognitive neuroscience. I suggest that while at present they seem to play something in between a minimal and a substantive explanatory role, there is reason to believe that representations have a substantial contribution to the construction of neuroscientic explanations of cognitive phenomena
-
49The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-KnowledgePhilosophical Psychology 27 (6): 934-938. 2014.No abstract
-
University of East AngliaSchool of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication StudiesLecturer
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Language |
Philosophy of Mind |
Philosophy of Cognitive Science |
Philosophy of Social Science |