-
7The paper introduces and discusses two different types of criticisms of epistemic externalism. First, there are criticisms of externalism which I call sceptical criticisms. So-called sceptical critics state that the externalist conception of justification leads to the consequence that no belief is justified and hence no belief constitutes knowledge. I defend the claim that sceptical criticisms of epistemic externalism are generally wrong, because the conclusion which they infer from available pr…Read more
-
12Desubstancializácia epistemických intuíciíOstium 14 (3). 2018.The paper deals with epistemic intuitions as a specific epistemological phenomenon. It points out some difficulties of examining this matter and suggests a new methodological perspective which seems promising with respect to removing such difficulties. The first part of the paper concerns with identification and characteristics of EI. They occur primarily within the so-called method of cases in which the judgements based on EI constitute demonstrations of “normal” understanding of knowledge. In …Read more
-
7Hodnota poznania a hodnota porozumeniaPro-Fil 19 (2): 27. 2018.Názor, že poznanie je hodnotné, tvorí kľúčový predpoklad epistemológie. Vo svojej klasickej podobe je vyjadrený komparatívnou tézou, že poznanie je hodnotnejšie než pravdivá mienka. Rôzne teoretické pokusy o vysvetlenie hodnoty poznania však doteraz neboli definitívne úspešné. Môže za to najmä tzv. problém pohltenia, v dôsledku ktorého akýkoľvek konštituent poznania nad rámec pravdivej mienky nemôže byť zdrojom hodnoty poznania. Časť autorov preto obracia pozornosť k fenoménu porozumenia, ktoré …Read more
-
9Hodnota poznania a hodnota porozumeniaPro-Fil 19 (2): 27. 2018.Názor, že poznanie je hodnotné, tvorí kľúčový predpoklad epistemológie. Vo svojej klasickej podobe je vyjadrený komparatívnou tézou, že poznanie je hodnotnejšie než pravdivá mienka. Rôzne teoretické pokusy o vysvetlenie hodnoty poznania však doteraz neboli definitívne úspešné. Môže za to najmä tzv. problém pohltenia, v dôsledku ktorého akýkoľvek konštituent poznania nad rámec pravdivej mienky nemôže byť zdrojom hodnoty poznania. Časť autorov preto obracia pozornosť k fenoménu porozumenia, ktoré …Read more
-
Controversies on the Nature of Justification in Contemporary Analytic EpistemologyFilozofia 68 (6): 517-522. 2013.
-
Why Do the Externalist Criteria of Justification Essentially Fail?Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (1): 37-49. 2013.
-
2On the Interpretation of Moore's Antiskeptical PhilosophyFilozofia 65 (1): 74-82. 2010.G. E. Moore replies to skepticism by using propositions which from the common sense perspective are trivially true. However, it seems that his replies are not effective, because the skeptic’s doubts concern precisely the common sense truths. This problem became the subject of various interpretations. N. Malcolm and B. Stroud suggest that Moore is not trying to refute skepticism directly . Therefore, they look for an alternative interpretation of Moore’s replies. They find the ground of their eff…Read more
-
4The Priority of Common Sense in PhilosophyCroatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (2): 319-337. 2021.The aim of this paper is to explore the issue of priority of common sense in philosophy. It is divided into four parts. The first part discusses examples of common-sense beliefs and indicates their specific nature, especially compared to mere common beliefs. The second part explores in more detail the supposed positive epistemic status of common-sense beliefs and the role they play in delimiting plausible philosophical theories. The third part overviews a few attempts to formulate a legitimate a…Read more
Areas of Specialization
Knowledge |
Skepticism |
Naturalism |
Epistemic Normativity |
Critical Thinking |
Areas of Interest
Epistemic Normativity |
Knowledge |
Skepticism |
Critical Thinking |
Naturalism |