Mathieu Trentesaux Mumen

Self-taught; professional programmer in management systems; not affiliated with any academic organization; no publications other than confidential. More than 25 years of personal research on metaontology through the selective reading of many philosophers and their commentators, according to their relation to metaontology (Heraclitus, Confucius, Aristotle, Brentano, Husserl and Heidegger, to mention only the most essential of a galaxy). Book sources, Internet and now AI.

Constant subject: the dual nature of things as a foundation of a universal ontological formalism. I face the necessity to express and deconstruct the philosophical schism from Parmenides onwards and the subsequent collapse of the pre-logical paradigm. I suggest that Socratic philosophy should have been called "philoratio" to keep intact the original meaning of what is now called natural philosophy (wisdom) as opposed to academic (reason).

The paradigm kept in reserve can be called, according to me, analogical or dialectical or of the third-included. I think and demonstrate that its categorical formalism is most clearly declared by the Chinese and impeccably implemented in the Aristotelian quaternities and in all their heritage, passing undoubtedly through Hegel for the first and Kant for the second.

I am the promoter of a simple but not simplistic theory, which some of my long-time interlocutors have not been able to destroy, finally asserting the strange argument: "if it existed, we would already know it". I encountered a lot of indifference and even hostility when I tried to communicate about my research. AI is very relaxing in this field; it is able to see its contradictions without affect and even to correct itself. Understanding my frustration, the AI guided me here.