-
67Symbolic Understanding of Pictures and Written Words Share a Common SourceJournal of Cognition and Culture 14 (3-4): 187-198. 2014.Here we examine the hypothesis that symbolic understanding across domains is mediated by a fundamental ‘symbolizing’ ability in young children. We tested 30 children aged 2–4 years on symbolic tasks assessing iconic and non-iconic word-referent and picture-referent understanding and administered standardised tests of symbolic play and receptive language. Children showed understanding of the symbol-referent relation earlier for pictures than written words, and performance within domains was corre…Read more
-
145Educating the design stance: Issues of coherence and transgression. Commentary on Bullot & ReberBehavioral and Brain Sciences. forthcoming.
-
92Do iPads promote symbolic understanding and word learning in children with autism?Frontiers in Psychology 6. 2015.
-
62Intentions vs. resemblance: Understanding pictures in typical development and autismCognition 131 (1): 44-59. 2014.
-
123Young children show representational flexibility when interpreting drawingsCognition 147 (C): 21-28. 2016.
-
158Educating the design stance: Issues of coherence and transgressionBehavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (2). 2013.Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding
Lynchburg, Virginia, United States of America