• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Michael Heidelberger

University Tübingen
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    96
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    2
  •  News and Updates
    25

 More details
  • University Tübingen
    Department of Philosophy
LMU Munich
Faculty of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Studies
PhD, 1978
Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Mathematics
20th Century Philosophy
Philosophy of Physical Science
Philosophy of Probability
General Philosophy of Science
1 more
  • All publications (96)
  •  3
    Pluralism and the Hypothetical in Heinrich Hertz’s Philosophy of Science
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 145-168. 2009.
  •  5
    Hypothesis and Convention in Poincaré’s Defense of Galilei Spacetime
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 193-220. 2009.
  •  2
    “Instrumentalism” and “Realism” as Categories in the History of Astronomy: Duhem vs. Popper, Maimonides vs. Gersonides
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 269-294. 2009.
  •  29
    Vaihinger and Poincaré: An Original Pragmatism?
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 221-250. 2009.
  •  5
    From Axioms to Conventions and Hypotheses: The Foundations of Mechanics and the Roots of Carl Neumann’s “Principles of the Galilean–Newtonian Theory”
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 77-98. 2009.
  •  41
    Hypotheticity and Realism – Duhem, Popper and Scientific Realism
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 295-312. 2009.
  •  40
    Hypothesis in Early Modern Science
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 7-38. 2009.
  •  4
    Hypothetical Metaphysics of Nature
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 341-364. 2009.
  •  55
    Hypotheses in 19th Century British Philosophy of Science: Herschel, Whewell, Mill
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 59-76. 2009.
  •  8
    Contingent Laws of Nature in Émile Boutroux
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 99-144. 2009.
  •  3
    Hypotheses and Conventions in Poincaré
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 169-192. 2009.
  •  11
    Experience and Hypotheses: Opinions within Locke’s Realm
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 39-58. 2009.
  •  1
    The Hypothesis of Reality and the Reality of Hypotheses
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 313-340. 2009.
  •  8
    Werner Heisenberg’s Position on a Hypothetical Conception of Science
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 251-268. 2009.
  •  1
    The Hypothesis of Reality and the Reality of Hypotheses
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 313-340. 2009.
  •  13
    Hypothetical Metaphysics of Nature
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 341-364. 2009.
  •  9
    Hypotheticity and Realism – Duhem, Popper and Scientific Realism
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 295-312. 2009.
  • “Instrumentalism” and “Realism” as Categories in the History of Astronomy: Duhem vs. Popper, Maimonides vs. Gersonides
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 269-294. 2009.
  •  9
    Werner Heisenberg’s Position on a Hypothetical Conception of Science
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 251-268. 2009.
  •  3
    Vaihinger and Poincaré: An Original Pragmatism?
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 221-250. 2009.
  •  5
    Hypothesis and Convention in Poincaré’s Defense of Galilei Spacetime
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 193-220. 2009.
  •  3
    Hypotheses and Conventions in Poincaré
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 169-192. 2009.
  •  5
    Pluralism and the Hypothetical in Heinrich Hertz’s Philosophy of Science
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 145-168. 2009.
  •  10
    Hypotheses in 19th Century British Philosophy of Science: Herschel, Whewell, Mill
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 59-76. 2009.
  •  14
    Hypothesis in Early Modern Science
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 7-38. 2009.
  •  10
    Introduction
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 1-6. 2009.
  •  1
    Was ist eine Art?
    Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58 (5): 816-822. 2014.
  •  4
    Helmholtz als Philosoph
    Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 43 (5): 835-844. 2014.
  •  23
    Introduction
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 1-6. 2009.
  •  54
    Contingent Laws of Nature in Émile Boutroux
    with Gregor Schiemann
    In Michael Heidelberger & Gregor Schiemann (eds.), The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, De Gruyter. pp. 99-144. 2009.
    In 1874, the French philosopher Émile Boutroux wrote a dissertationon the contingency of the laws of nature that highly influenced academic philosophy during the French Third Republic and led to a more hypothetical view of the natural sciences and mathematics. Boutroux took over the concept of contingency from the neo-Kantian philosopher Eduard Zeller who had insisted against Hegel on the role of contingency in history, and carried it over to nature. From this he tried to show that the science…Read more
    In 1874, the French philosopher Émile Boutroux wrote a dissertationon the contingency of the laws of nature that highly influenced academic philosophy during the French Third Republic and led to a more hypothetical view of the natural sciences and mathematics. Boutroux took over the concept of contingency from the neo-Kantian philosopher Eduard Zeller who had insisted against Hegel on the role of contingency in history, and carried it over to nature. From this he tried to show that the sciences are hierarchically structured such that each layer is irreducible to its more basic predecessor. He also distinguished between two kinds of natural laws in a way very similar to Nancy Cartwright in the1980s. It is finally shown that Boutroux’s view on the nature of mathematics as a hypothetical science had a strong impact on Poincaré.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback