• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Michael N. Keas

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    4
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
Areas of Specialization
General Philosophy of Science
Areas of Interest
General Philosophy of Science
  • All publications (4)
  •  5
    Life’s Complex Specified Information Is a Kind of Value
    with Paul M. Gould
    Zygon. forthcoming.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  2596
    Systematizing the theoretical virtues
    Synthese 195 (6): 2761-2793. 2018.
    There are at least twelve major virtues of good theories: evidential accuracy, causal adequacy, explanatory depth, internal consistency, internal coherence, universal coherence, beauty, simplicity, unification, durability, fruitfulness, and applicability. These virtues are best classified into four classes: evidential, coherential, aesthetic, and diachronic. Each virtue class contains at least three virtues that sequentially follow a repeating pattern of progressive disclosure and expansion. Sys…Read more
    There are at least twelve major virtues of good theories: evidential accuracy, causal adequacy, explanatory depth, internal consistency, internal coherence, universal coherence, beauty, simplicity, unification, durability, fruitfulness, and applicability. These virtues are best classified into four classes: evidential, coherential, aesthetic, and diachronic. Each virtue class contains at least three virtues that sequentially follow a repeating pattern of progressive disclosure and expansion. Systematizing the theoretical virtues in this manner clarifies each virtue and suggests how they might have a coordinated and cumulative role in theory formation and evaluation across the disciplines—with allowance for discipline specific modification. An informal and flexible logic of theory choice is in the making here. Evidential accuracy (empirical fit), according to my systematization, is not a largely isolated trait of good theories, as some (realists and antirealists) have made it out to be. Rather, it bears multifaceted relationships, constituting significant epistemic entanglements, with other theoretical virtues.
    Nonempirical VirtuesRobustness in ScienceTheoretical Virtues, MiscPhilosophy of Science, General Wor…Read more
    Nonempirical VirtuesRobustness in ScienceTheoretical Virtues, MiscPhilosophy of Science, General WorksValue-Free ScienceSimplicity and ParsimonyAesthetic Virtues in ScienceEpistemology of Specific Domains, MiscAesthetic Universals
  •  79
    Herbert McLeod. Chemistry and Theology in Mid-Victorian London: The Diary of Herbert McLeod, 1860–1870. Edited with an introduction by Frank A. J. L. James, London and New York: Mansell, 1987. Pp. 30, 23 microfiches, index. No price given
    British Journal for the History of Science 23 (4): 491-491. 1990.
    Book review
    Realism in ChemistryPhilosophy of Chemistry, Misc
  •  80
    Scientism and Secularism: Learning to Respond to a Dangerous Ideology
    Philosophia Christi 21 (1): 225-228. 2019.
    Science and Religion
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback