Michal Valčo

Driven by sophisticated artificial intelligence algorithms, social media channels have grown pervasive in the digital era and are changing not only the fabric of communication but also the fundamental core of human values. This paper explores the complex interaction between AI-driven social media systems and their significant influence on ethical frameworks, personal psychology, and societal norms. Through an analysis of the seductive power of technology, the phenomena of mimetic desire, and the hazy lines separating actual from idealized identities, I expose the subtle ways in which artificial intelligence algorithms control user involvement, create echo chambers, and propagate prejudices. The paper also covers the psychological foundations of social comparison and the attention economy, stressing the negative consequences on mental health and the declining real human connection. In response to these difficulties, the study suggests a forward-looking view stressing the need to include ethical issues and human-centered design ideas in artificial intelligence research. Practical solutions, including mindfulness practices and regulatory frameworks, are explored as means to safeguard human autonomy and promote a healthier digital ecosystem. My goal is to start a discussion on creating a symbiotic relationship between humans and technology such that social media enhances rather than degrades human values

This paper embarks on a substantive intellectual journey to dissect the philosophical underpinnings of Jean-Paul Sartre's existentialism, with a particular focus on the symbiotic relationship between freedom and responsibility. The paper utilizes a multi-faceted analytical framework to scrutinize the ontological and ethical dimensions of Sartre's conceptualization of freedom, its inherent connection to human responsibility, and the resultant ethical quandaries. By expanding the scope of discourse, the paper introduces a meticulous critique from the vantage point of Christian Personalism. This counter-perspective serves not only as a critique but also as a platform for dialogue, elucidating points of convergence and divergence between existentialist and personalist philosophies. Beyond mere theoretical examination, the paper illuminates the contemporary relevance and application of these philosophical traditions, especially in grappling with pressing ethical, social, and political issues. Concluding with a richly textured comparative analysis, the paper aims to contribute meaningfully to the ongoing scholarly discourse on existentialism and personalism, thereby enriching our collective understanding of complex philosophical constructs like freedom, responsibility, and human dignity.

The contemporary scientific and technological progress builds on the accomplishments of classical mechanics from the 19th century when the so-called ‘European scientific method and values’ were accepted practically by the whole educated world. Most scientific results and conclusions were reached based on the causal ontological approach proposed in principle already by Plato’s Socrates and developed further by Aristotle. Despite the late-modern paradigm shift in science (Galilei, Newton, etc.), the topicality of the ontological approach proposed by Aristotle (II. Analytics) remains. On the other hand, 19th and 20th century philosophers, mainly positivists such as Mach and Avenarius but also Schlick and Carnap, attempted to change this approach to unify scientific knowledge in accordance with an ideological, i.e. positivist outlook on reality. The authors place a special emphasis on the contribution of Rudolf Carnap and his interaction with Martin Heidegger. Three very different theories are applied to physical reality in the present: classical mechanics in the standard macroscopic realm, Copenhagen quantum mechanics in the microscopic realm, and special theory of reality in both realms in the case of systems consisting of objects having higher velocity values. Any explanation or description of transitions between different realms and theories had not been provided until now. Our paper describes the corresponding evolution in the modern period and identifies the underlying false philosophical assumptions and statements existing in today’s scientific systems. We will then demonstrate that one common theory for all realms of reality may exist; one that will be based fully on Hamilton equations (only the law of force of Newton is to be generalized). Only time change of particle impulse (not directly acceleration) is to be determined by a corresponding force. All necessary characteristics of physical reality may be derived in such a case. Direct correlations of such physical approach to philosophy (ontology) will be drawn.