•  8
    Italian New Realism and Transcendental Philosophy
    Philosophy Today 61 (3): 539-554. 2017.
    By recognizing Immanuel Kant as the founder of the so-called being-knowing fallacy, the Italian new realism proposed and defended by Maurizio Ferraris argues for the autonomy of ontology from epistemology. The dependence of reality on our conceptual framework would in fact transform our world in a system of beliefs that loses its connection with the “hardness” of the given data. This paper discusses Ferraris’s claims by maintaining that they are based upon an insufficient reading of history of p…Read more
  •  22
    Italian New Realism and Transcendental Philosophy
    Philosophy Today 61 (3): 539-554. 2017.
    By recognizing Immanuel Kant as the founder of the so-called being-knowing fallacy, the Italian new realism proposed and defended by Maurizio Ferraris argues for the autonomy of ontology from epistemology. The dependence of reality on our conceptual framework would in fact transform our world in a system of beliefs that loses its connection with the “hardness” of the given data. This paper discusses Ferraris’s claims by maintaining that they are based upon an insufficient reading of history of p…Read more
  •  8
    Die Frage nach dem wirklichen Julius Cäsar – und warum sie immer noch aktuell ist
    Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67 (3): 392-413. 2019.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie Jahrgang: 67 Heft: 3 Seiten: 392-413.
  •  14
    Data-Phenomena: Quid Juris?
    Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 70 (4): 527-549. 2016.
  • W.J. Mander, British idealism. A history, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, 628 págs (review)
    Convivium: revista de filosofía 26 199-201. 2013.
  •  8
    Despite Georg W.F. Hegel’s claim that “philosophy, at any rate, always comes too late” because, like the owl of Minerva, it “begins its flight only with the onset of dusk” [1], and beyond the contextual and contingent issues that might contribute to its return in auge,1 there exist important theoretical reasons to consider the question “why Hegel now and again?” still legitimate and current.[...]