-
6The Place and Reliability of Aristotle's Induction in the Scientific ProcessEntelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review 8 (1): 11-26. 2024.This article analyses the relationship between deduction and induction by focusing on Aristotle's knowledge acquisition processes. The deductive and inductive processes in Aristotelian science are analysed in depth, and it is emphasised that these two processes are, in fact, interrelated. It is claimed that induction and deduction use logical inference but are not themselves an inference. The structure of inductive inference is determined, and the deductive inference and the inferential part of …Read more
-
7Matematik Nesnelerin Ontolojisi: CevherleştirmeBeytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 14 (14:1): 01-10. 2024.
-
26The Fourth Figure in AristotleEntelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review 2 (2): 75-98. 2018.This paper investigates whether Aristotle was aware of the fourth figure, and if he was aware of the fourth figure, why he excluded it from his system. Various commentators have explained why this figure does not exist in the system, so this paper compiles ane examines these arguments through a certain logical frame. By inquiring into why the fourth figure was not included in his logical system, the paper considers whether logical factors may explain this exclusion.
-
21Protasis and Apophansis in Aristotle’s LogicBeytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 8 (1): 1-17. 2018.
-
687Aristoteles’in Matematik Felsefesi ve Matematik SoyutlamaBeytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 7 (2): 33-49. 2017.Although there are many questions to be asked about philosophy of mathematics, the fundamental questions to be asked will be questions about what the mathematical object is in view of being and what the mathematical reasoning is in view of knowledge. It is clear that other problems will develop in parallel within the framework of the answers to these questions. For this rea son, when we approach Aristotle's philosophy of mathematics over these two basic problems, we come up with the concept of …Read more
-
292Aristoteles’te abese irca yöntemiyle ispatlamaKutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 23 91-105. 2013.Redictio ad absurdum is an important part of Aristotle’s syllogistic. It is connected with direct proof and they are complementary methods. All moods of Aristotle are provable by direct methods and redictio ad absurdum. In this paper, I have studied on the bases and principles of redictio ad absurdum, I showed how to prove by redictio ad absurdum, and how to prove Aristotle by redictio ad absurdum. By redictio ad absurdum, all forms of Aristotle’s method proved in the first figure can be reduced…Read more
-
1302Ahmed Cevdet paşa’nin matik ve ilim anlayişiKutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 22 173-185. 2012.There are a lot of studies on Ahmed Cevdet Paşa who has been considered as statesman, politician, jurist, historian, sociologist and educationalist. At the same time Ahmet Cevdet Paşa’s studies on logic are critically important when we deal with the last period of the Ottoman Empire. His book which is called Miyar-ı Sedad had both influenced the development of instruction of logic education in madrasahs and created a turning point in the studies on modern logic. For this reason we have discuss…Read more
-
305Aristoteles’ in izahat Yöntemi Hakkindaki YorumlarKutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 25 115-127. 2014.There is very little information about the proving by Aristotle’s ecthesis method both in Aristotle’s and his commentators’ articles. Researches on ecthesis which were made by recent commentators are only on expository term. In our study, comments have been evaluated, points that are subject to contradiction have been determined, and opinions about ecthesis have been cited by giving proofs obtained by the ecthesis method.
Murat Kelikli
Bartin University
-
Bartin UniversityAssociate Professor
Areas of Specialization
Logic and Philosophy of Logic |
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy |
Science, Logic, and Mathematics |