• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Nicola Bonatti

LMU Munich
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    2
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    4
  •  News and Updates
    4

 More details
LMU Munich
Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy
PhD
CV
Homepage
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
0000-0002-1442-4336
Areas of Specialization
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Mathematics
Areas of Interest
20th Century Analytic Philosophy
Philosophy of Language
General Philosophy of Science
  • All publications (2)
  •  62
    What are Extremal Axioms?
    Philosophia Mathematica. forthcoming.
    Extremal axioms impose a condition of either minimality or maximality on the admissible models of an axiomatic theory. In this paper, I propose an alternative formulation of arithmetic and real analysis based on extremal axioms. Once properly formulated, the second-order extremal axiom restricts the quantifiers of the theory to the minimal or maximal domain of discourse. It is proved that extremal axioms are logically equivalent to standard assumptions of, respectively, second-order Induction an…Read more
    Extremal axioms impose a condition of either minimality or maximality on the admissible models of an axiomatic theory. In this paper, I propose an alternative formulation of arithmetic and real analysis based on extremal axioms. Once properly formulated, the second-order extremal axiom restricts the quantifiers of the theory to the minimal or maximal domain of discourse. It is proved that extremal axioms are logically equivalent to standard assumptions of, respectively, second-order Induction and Archimedean Completeness. Finally, I distinguish between internalist and externalist accounts of mathematical structures as characterized by extremal axioms and their corresponding axiomatic theories.
    AnalysisAxiomatic TruthLogic and Philosophy of Logic
  •  224
    A Reassessment of Cantorian Abstraction based on the ε-operator (review)
    Synthese 200 (5): 1-26. 2022.
    Cantor’s abstractionist account of cardinal numbers has been criticized by Frege as a psychological theory of numbers which leads to contradiction. The aim of the paper is to meet these objections by proposing a reassessment of Cantor’s proposal based upon the set theoretic framework of Bourbaki—called BK—which is a First-order set theory extended with Hilbert’s ε-operator in the BK definition of cardinal numbers.
    Epistemology of Mathematics, Misc19th Century LogicThe Nature of Sets, MiscNonstandard Axiomatizatio…Read more
    Epistemology of Mathematics, Misc19th Century LogicThe Nature of Sets, MiscNonstandard AxiomatizationsCardinals and Ordinals, MiscHistory: Philosophy of Mathematics20th Century Logic
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback