• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Nicola Emery

Università della Svizzera Italiana
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    8
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
  •  News and Updates
    2

 More details
  • Università della Svizzera Italiana
    Associate Professor (Part-time)
Areas of Specialization
History of Western Philosophy
Aesthetics
Aesthetics and Culture
Philosophy of Specific Arts
Aesthetics, Miscellaneous
Philosophy of Visual Art
Critical Theory
Max Horkheimer
Walter Benjamin
Critical Theory, Misc
Theodor W. Adorno
6 more
Areas of Interest
History of Western Philosophy
Other Academic Areas
Philosophical Traditions
Aesthetics
Aesthetics and Culture
Philosophy of Specific Arts
Aesthetics, Miscellaneous
Philosophy of Visual Art
Critical Theory
Max Horkheimer
Walter Benjamin
Critical Theory, Misc
Theodor W. Adorno
8 more
  • All publications (8)
  •  14
    List of Abbreviations
    with Stefano Marino, Pietro Terzi, Arno Schubbach, Günter Figal, Dennis J. Schmidt, Hans-Peter Krüger, Tom Huhn, Serena Feloj, Patrice Canivez, Anne Sauvagnargues, Dario Cecchi, Claudio Paolucci, Scott R. Stroud, Diarmuid Costello, Thomas Teufel, Alessandro Bertinetto, and Thomas W. Leddy
    In Stefano Marino & Pietro Terzi (eds.), Kant’s ›Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations, De Gruyter. pp. 1-2. 2020.
  •  44
    For nonconformism: Max Horkheimer and Friedrich Pollock: the other Frankfurt school
    Brill. 2022.
    Subject of numerous interpretations and studies, the vicissitudes of the famous Frankfurt Institute for Social Research nevertheless still reserve some little-known pages, such as the human and scientific relationship that bound philosopher Max Horkheimer and economist Friedrich Pollock for over fifty years. Based on texts and letters translated here into English for the first time as well as some previously unpublished documents, the book reconstructs the crucial moments in the friendship betwe…Read more
    Subject of numerous interpretations and studies, the vicissitudes of the famous Frankfurt Institute for Social Research nevertheless still reserve some little-known pages, such as the human and scientific relationship that bound philosopher Max Horkheimer and economist Friedrich Pollock for over fifty years. Based on texts and letters translated here into English for the first time as well as some previously unpublished documents, the book reconstructs the crucial moments in the friendship between the two scholars with a narrative style and philological accuracy. Nicola Emery accompanies us through the two friends and intellectuals' "nonconformism" and search for an alternative life-form that led to the birth of the Frankfurt critical theory.
  •  34
    Walter Benjamin non finito: confronti, letture critiche, ricognizioni (edited book)
    Mimesis. 2022.
  •  26
    Giuseppe Rensi: l'eloquenza del nichilismo
    Seam. 2001.
  •  30
    Per il non conformismo: Max Horkheimer e Friedrich Pollock: l'altra Scuola di Francoforte
    Castelvecchi. 2015.
  •  20
    Kant, Max Horkheimer and Picasso
    In Stefano Marino & Pietro Terzi (eds.), Kant’s ›Critique of Aesthetic Judgment‹ in the 20th Century: A Companion to Its Main Interpretations, De Gruyter. pp. 133-158. 2020.
  •  73
    L'attualismo come ´terremoto metafisico´: l'ambivalente rapporto Rensi-Gentile
    Idee 28 219-244. 1995.
  • Platone e l'architettura del nomos
    Studia Philosophica 60 257-286. 2001.
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback