• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Olivia Fox

University of Bristol
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    4
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates

 More details
  • University of Bristol
    Undergraduate
Areas of Interest
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (4)
  •  67
    EEG & Eye-Tracking Changes With Expertise In A Multi-Vehicle Control Task
    with Assaf Harel, Natalie Hansen, Brad Galego, Matthew Pava, and Bartlett Russell
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12. 2018.
    Philosophy of Neuroscience
  •  86
    Assessment of Top-Down Attention for a Closed-Loop Performance Enhancement System Using High-Frequency Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials and Eye Tracking
    with Matthew Pava, Walker Alexander, Gabriel Collins, Brad Galego, Jon Russo, Assaf Harel, Natalie Hansen, and Bartlett Russell
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12. 2018.
    Philosophy of Neuroscience
  •  59
    How Configural Is the Configural Superiority Effect? A Neuroimaging Investigation of Emergent Features in Visual Cortex
    with Assaf Harel and Kevin B. Bennett
    Frontiers in Psychology 8. 2017.
    Cognitive Sciences
  •  78
    Courtship Feeding in Humans?
    with Thomas R. Alley and Lauren W. Brubaker
    Human Nature 24 (4): 430-443. 2013.
    Food sharing may be used for mate attraction, sexual access, or mate retention in humans, as in many other species. Adult humans tend to perceive more intimacy in a couple if feeding is observed, but the increased perceived intimacy may be due to resource provisioning rather than feeding per se. To address this issue, 210 university students (66 male) watched five short videos, each showing a different mixed-sex pair of adults dining together and including feeding or simple provisioning or no fo…Read more
    Food sharing may be used for mate attraction, sexual access, or mate retention in humans, as in many other species. Adult humans tend to perceive more intimacy in a couple if feeding is observed, but the increased perceived intimacy may be due to resource provisioning rather than feeding per se. To address this issue, 210 university students (66 male) watched five short videos, each showing a different mixed-sex pair of adults dining together and including feeding or simple provisioning or no food sharing. A survey concerning attraction and intimacy in the dyad was completed after each video. Both provisioning and feeding produced higher ratings of “Involvement,” with feeding producing the highest ratings. Similarly, the perceived attraction of each actor to the other was lowest when no food sharing was shown and highest when feeding was displayed. These findings are consistent with a view of feeding as a courtship display in humans.
    Ethics
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback