• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Olivier Mathieu

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    8
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    7

 More details
  • All publications (8)
  •  45
    Can Heidegger's Poetic Saying Account for More (or Less) Than Great Artworks?
    Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (1): 51-68. 2017.
    ABSTRACT:In this paper I mobilize the Heideggerian concept of poetic saying [Dichtung] to describe features that pertain to the accomplishment of an artwork in the institutional setting of an artworld. Following Binkley and Davies, I first describe performances generative of artworks as ‘piece-specification’. I argue that a condition of ‘artistic creativity’ bears upon piece-specification that is insufficiently accounted for by these authors and that Heidegger's concept of poetic saying can help…Read more
    ABSTRACT:In this paper I mobilize the Heideggerian concept of poetic saying [Dichtung] to describe features that pertain to the accomplishment of an artwork in the institutional setting of an artworld. Following Binkley and Davies, I first describe performances generative of artworks as ‘piece-specification’. I argue that a condition of ‘artistic creativity’ bears upon piece-specification that is insufficiently accounted for by these authors and that Heidegger's concept of poetic saying can help flesh it out. To that end, I show that it is at least coherent with some of Heidegger's phenomenological insights to argue that (1) poetic sayings are not necessarily tied to the advent of ‘great artworks’ and that (2) poetic sayings thus lend themselves to an analysis that views them as the intentional accomplishment of a meaning-event [Sinnereignis]. I then use the intentional structure of poetic sayings to describe how one can intend to achieve piece-specification in a creative yet recognizable manner.
  •  79
    VASALOU, SOPHIA. Schopenhauer and the Aesthetic Standpoint: Philosophy as a Practice of the Sublime. Cambridge University Press, 2014, 237 pp., $99.99 cloth
    Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (4): 420-423. 2016.
    History of Aesthetics
  •  80
    Jean-Luc Marion, De surcroît, PUF, Coll. « Perspective critique », Paris, 2001, 208 pages. Jean-Luc Marion, De surcroît, PUF, Coll. « Perspective critique », Paris, 2001, 208 pages (review)
    Philosophiques 30 (1): 280-285. 2003.
    Martin Heidegger
  •  1
    Avons-nous le temps pour l’art ?: Regard critique sur la relation entre « authenticité » et « temporalité » dans l’expérience esthétique gadamérienne
    Revue Phares 4 (1). 2004.
  •  53
    PIPPIN, ROBERT. After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. University of Chicago Press, 2014, x + 159 pp., 36 b&w + 7 color illus., $27.50 cloth (review)
    Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (2): 201-203. 2015.
    AestheticsHistory of Aesthetics
  • Avons-nous le temps pour l’art?: Regard critique sur la relation entre « authenticité » et « temporalité » dans l’expérience esthétique gadamérienne
    Phares 4 (1). 2004.
  •  97
    Schmidt, Dennis J. Between Word and Image: Heidegger, Klee, and Gadamer on Gesture and Genesis. Indiana University Press, 2013, x + 187 pp., 21 b&w illus., $63.00 cloth (review)
    Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2): 214-217. 2014.
    AestheticsHans-Georg GadamerHistory of Aesthetics
  •  67
    Beyond Mere Conjectures: Young’s Method of Original Composition
    British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (4): 465-479. 2015.
    Frequently quoted in the context of contemporary philosophical reflections on ‘artistic creativity’, Edward Young’s Conjectures on Original Composition are generally read as articulating an anti‐traditionalist account of genius. Against this reading, I argue that Young does not reject the value of traditional models and conventions, but rather means to insist on the artist’s capacity to determine such values through her natural capacity for autonomous critical thinking. I support this claim by s…Read more
    Frequently quoted in the context of contemporary philosophical reflections on ‘artistic creativity’, Edward Young’s Conjectures on Original Composition are generally read as articulating an anti‐traditionalist account of genius. Against this reading, I argue that Young does not reject the value of traditional models and conventions, but rather means to insist on the artist’s capacity to determine such values through her natural capacity for autonomous critical thinking. I support this claim by showing how he draws from Neo‐Platonism and the experimental philosophy of Francis Bacon in order to develop what has all the appearances of a method of original composition. In the last lines of the paper, I suggest that this method may have heuristic value for the understanding of artworks as ‘artistic creations’ in the context of contemporary institutional theories of art.
    Aesthetic CognitionArt and Artworks
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback