In establishing a consilient basis between the social and biological sciences, the human brain and the nature of the self continue to present the most formidable obstacle, the greatest challenge, and yet the ultimate key to any final deep understanding of social, political and cultural processes. In this paper we interpret such phenomena as successively complex levels of ‘exfoliation’, growing from a neu- robiological base. Their emergent qualities and interconnections have hitherto constituted …
Read moreIn establishing a consilient basis between the social and biological sciences, the human brain and the nature of the self continue to present the most formidable obstacle, the greatest challenge, and yet the ultimate key to any final deep understanding of social, political and cultural processes. In this paper we interpret such phenomena as successively complex levels of ‘exfoliation’, growing from a neu- robiological base. Their emergent qualities and interconnections have hitherto constituted separate domains of study within the social sciences. The problem of psychohistory is to seek some way in which degrees of co-dependence between seperately emergent phenomena at successive levels can be visualised, and any invariant properties identified and understood. The topological models of R. Thom and E.C. Zeeman may suggest some possible approaches. Inasmuch as psychic growth itself is an accretion process, the roles of pre- and post-natal trauma in determining the later ramifications of neural development are crucial, yet the consequences remain to a certain extent unavoidable at the present level of human development. Certain theological traditions based on an apophatic approach to human consciousness have recognised this and may offer some insight into how the emotional consequences of early trauma (and the group fantasies they generate later at social, political and cultural levels) may eventually be understood and contained.