-
24Ad Infinitum: New Essays on Epistemological Infinitism (edited book)Oxford University Press UK. 2014.Infinitism is an ancient view in epistemology about the structure of knowledge and epistemic justification, according to which there are no foundational reasons for belief. The view has never been popular, and is often associated with skepticism, but after languishing for centuries it has recently begun a resurgence. Ad Infinitum presents new work on the topic by leading epistemologists. They shed new light on infinitism's distinctive strengths and weaknesses, and address questions, new and old,…Read more
-
4Skepticism: Ascent and Assent?In John Greco (ed.), Ernest Sosa: And His Critics, Wiley-blackwell. 2004.This chapter contains section titled: Consideration of (T1) Consideration of (T2)
-
1Praktische Logik: Traditionen und Tendenzen: Abhandlungen eines Seminars beim 13. Internationalen Wittgenstein-Symposium Kirchberg am Wechsel 1988 (edited book)Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1990.
-
26El conocimiento humano Y el progreso Infinito Del razonamientoSignos Filosóficos 10 (19): 175-204. 2008.
-
65How to get Certain Knowledge from Fallible JustificationEpisteme 16 (4): 395-412. 2019.“Real knowledge,” as I use the term, is the most highly prized form of true belief sought by an epistemic agent. This paper argues that defeasible infinitism provides a good way to characterize real knowledge and it shows how real knowledge can arise from fallible justification. Then, I argue that there are two ways of interpreting Ernest Sosa's account of real knowledge as belief that is aptly formed and capable of being fully defended. On the one hand, if beliefs are aptly formed only if they …Read more
-
80Foundationalism and the Infinite Regress of ReasonsMetaepistemology and Skepticism (review)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4): 919. 1998.In Metaepistemology and Skepticism (Rowman & Littlefield:\n1995), Richard Fumerton defends foundationalism. As part of\nthe defense he rejects infinitism--the view that holds that\nthe solution to the problem of the regress of justificatory\nreasons is that the reasons are infinitely many and\nnonrepeating. I examine some of those arguments and attempt\nto show that they are not really telling against (at least\nsome versions of) infinitism. Along the way I present some\nobjections to his accoun…Read more
-
The Revolt Against Sense-Data: A Defense of the Sense-Data FrameworkDissertation, Yale University. 1966.
-
The Concept of KnowledgeIn Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Genealogy to Iqbal, Routledge. 1996.
-
14Contemporary Responses to Agrippa's TrilemmaIn John Greco (ed.), The Oxford handbook of skepticism, Oxford University Press. 2008.This article discusses contemporary response to the epistemic regress problem or Agrippa's trilemma. The epistemic regress problem is considered the most crucial in the entire theory of knowledge and it is a major concern for many contemporary epistemologists. However, only two of the three alternative solutions have been developed in any detail, foundationalism and coherentism. Infinitism was not seriously considered as a solution because of the finite-mind objection. This article also provides…Read more
-
Knowledge is True, Non-defeated Justified BeliefIn Luper Steven (ed.), Essential Knowledge, :ongman. 2003.
-
Contemporary ScepticismIn Dancy Jonathan & Sosa Ernest (eds.), A Companion to Epitemology, Blackwell. 1992.
-
141The Virtues of InconsistencyThe Monist 68 (1): 105-135. 1985.I "argue" that by knowingly accepting a set of propositions which is logically inconsistent, An epistemic agent need not violate any valid epistemic rule. Those types of logically inconsistent sets which it is permissible to accept are distinguished from those which may not be accepted. The results of the discussion are applied to the lottery paradox set of propositions and the preface paradox set. I also "suggest" that it may be an epistemic virtue to accept some inconsistent sets
-
51Contextualism and the Real Nature of Academic SkepticismPhilosophical Issues 10 (1): 108-116. 2000.
-
1InfinitismIn Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, Routledge. pp. 245-256. 2010.
-
1CertaintyIn Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Genealogy to Iqbal, Routledge. 1996.
-
9El contextualismo y la verdadera naturaleza del escepticismo académicoTeorema: International Journal of Philosophy 19 (3): 127-140. 2000.
-
298Why Not Infinitism?Epistemology 5 199-208. 2000.As the Pyrrhonians made clear, reasons that adequately justify beliefs can have only three possible structures: foundationalism, coherentism, and infinitism. Infinitism—the view that adequate reasons for our beliefs are infinite and non-repeating—has never been developed carefully, much less advocated. In this paper, I will argue that only infinitism can satisfy two intuitively plausible constraints on good reasoning: the avoidance of circular reasoning and the avoidance of arbitrariness. Furthe…Read more
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |