• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Rob De De Vries

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    5
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    3

 More details
Homepage
  • All publications (5)
  •  68
    Research participants'" irrational" expectations: common or commonly mismeasured?
    with S. Y. Kim, R. Wilson, S. Parnami, S. Frank, K. Kieburtz, and R. G. Holloway
    IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (1): 1-9. 2013.
    Ethics
  •  186
    Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical fallacies
    with Bert Gordijn
    Bioethics 23 (4): 193-201. 2009.
    This paper analyses the concept of empirical ethics as well as three meta-ethical fallacies that empirical ethics is said to face: the is-ought problem, the naturalistic fallacy and violation of the fact-value distinction. Moreover, it answers the question of whether empirical ethics (necessarily) commits these three basic meta-ethical fallacies.
    Biomedical EthicsExperimental Philosophy: Ethics, Misc
  •  63
    Did You Know?
    with B. C. Martinson
    Academic Medicine 82 (9). 2007.
  • Why I am not a bioethicist
    Bioethics Examiner 6 (3): 1-2. 2002.
  • First do no harm: Institutional Review Boards and behavioral health research
    with Deborah De Bruin and Andrew Goodgame
    Ethics and Behavior 14 (3): 351-368. 2004.
    Professional EthicsScientific Research Ethics
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback