-
The Structure of Emotions: Investigations in Cognitive PhilosophyCambridge University Press. 1990.The Structure of Emotions argues that emotion concepts should have a much more important role in the social and behavioural sciences than they now enjoy, and shows that certain influential psychological theories of emotions overlook the explanatory power of our emotion concepts. Professor Gordon also outlines a new account of the nature of commonsense (or 'folk') psychology in general.
-
EmotionIn Donald Borchert (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Vol. 2) (2nd Edition), . pp. 197-203. 2005.
-
85The Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms upon Canadian Mental Health Law: The Dawn of a New Era or Business as Usual?Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (3-4): 190-197. 1986.
-
54Psychological research has generally suffered from methodological fundamentalism, which is an overly strict interpretation of what is considered “scientific” and has created a psychology of triviality. Methodological fundamentalism often constricts the study of a complex dynamic psychology that encompasses both observed and unobserved reality with interacting and interdependent variables. In Against Method, Feyerabend (1993) posits there could be no set scientific method and that great scientist…Read more
-
70Cross slip and the plastic deformation of NaCl single and polycrystals at high pressurePhilosophical Magazine 21 (171): 469-478. 1970.
-
investigation).<sup>{1}</sup> We project ourselves into what, from his remarks and other indications, we imagine the speaker's state of mind to have been, . . . even into what from his behavior we imagine a mouse's state of mind to have been, and dramatize it as a belief, wish or striving, verbalized as seems relevant and natural to us in the state thus
-
5'Radical' simulationismIn Peter Carruthers & Peter K. Smith (eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind, Cambridge University Press. 1996.
-
The Structure of Emotions: Investigations in Cognitive PhilosophyBehavior and Philosophy 18 (1): 63-67. 1990.
-
15Department of Philosophy, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri FRIDAY, April 8 SATURDAY, April 9 Welcome: Roger Gibson University (review)Minds and Machines 3 (511). 1993.
-
39Benefits and Costs of a Propositional Focus: Response to DeighBehavior and Philosophy 18 (2). 1990.
-
372Simulation theoryIn Lynn Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Nature Publishing Group. 2003.What is the simulation theory? Arguments for simulation theory Simulation theory versus theory theory Simulation theory and cognitive science Versions of simulation theory A possible test of the simulation theory.
-
Moorean pretenseIn Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore’s Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person, Oxford University Press. 2007.
-
14Autism and the "theory of mind" debateIn George Graham & G. Lynn Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology, Mit Press. 1994.
-
72The Structure of Emotions: Investigations in Cognitive PhilosophyPhilosophical Review 99 (2): 266. 1990.
-
337Sympathy, simulation, and the impartial spectatorIn L. May, Michael Friedman & A. Clark (eds.), Mind and Morals: Essays on Ethics and Cognitive Science, Mit Press. pp. 727-742. 1996.
-
130Sellars’s Ryleans RevisitedProtoSociology 14 102-114. 2000.Wilfrid Sellars's essay, "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind," (1) introduced, although it did not exactly endorse, what many philosophers consider the first defense of functionalism in the philosophy of mind and the original "theory" theory of commonsense psychology
-
112Empathy, simulation, and PamBehavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1): 37-37. 2001.The wealth of important and convergent evidence discussed in the target article contrasts with the poorly conceived theory put forward to explain it. The simulation theory does a better job of explaining how automatic “mirroring” mechanisms might work together with high-level cognitive processes. It also explains what the authors' PAM theory merely stipulates.
-
144The prior question: Do human primates have a theory of mind?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1): 120-121. 1998.Given Heyes's construal of there is still no convincing evidence of theory of mind in human primates, much less nonhuman. Rather than making unfounded assumptions about what underlies human social competence, one should ask what mechanisms other primates have and then inquire whether more sophisticated elaborations of those might not account for much of human competence
St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America