-
15Comments on Walter Riker’s “The Complicity Objection and the Return of Prescriptions”Southwest Philosophy Review 31 (2): 59-62. 2015.
-
28Comments on “Aristotelian and Kantian Self-Legislation” by Reshef Agam-SegalSouthwest Philosophy Review 28 (2): 43-45. 2012.I make a case for a non-Aristotelian reading of Kant’s moral philosophy. In particular, I distinguish between two activities called “self-legislation”: Aristotelian and Kantian. Aristotelian self-legislation is the activity of determining the organizing principle of our own practical life. Every action of ours takes part in this project, which is thus part of the principle of every action. In contrast, not all actions are acts of Kantian self-legislation. To legislate for ourselves in this sense…Read more
-
51Hey, You, What’s so Special about the Second-Person Perspective?Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1): 205-213. 2010.
-
34On the Continuation of the Craft Analogy in Republic IISouthwest Philosophy Review 25 (1): 83-91. 2009.
-
23A Matter of Facts: Comments on “Can Facts be Truth-makers?” by Justin ClarkeSouthwest Philosophy Review 30 (2): 1-4. 2014.
-
19Comments on “Moral Excuses and Blame-Based Theories of Moral Wrongness” by Benjamin RossiSouthwest Philosophy Review 32 (2): 53-55. 2016.
-
28On the Reconciliation of the Spinozistic Doctrines of the Eternality of the Mind and Monistic ParallelismSouthwest Philosophy Review 24 (1): 211-218. 2008.
St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America