Saeid Karimi

The present article examines the possibility of attributing personhood to artificial intelligence agents, a concept central to determining moral status. The debate on personhood has long been central in applied ethics, particularly in discussions on abortion, where philosophers such as Mary Anne Warren proposed five criteria—consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, capacity for communication, and self-awareness—as key indicators of personhood. The present study applies these criteria to artificial intelligence systems and asks whether their cognitive and functional capacities are sufficient for moral consideration. While certain features such as memory, goal-directed behavior, and limited moral interaction are identifiable in some AI systems, the absence of self-awareness and subjective experience remains a fundamental obstacle to full personhood. The article further engages with the views of Kant, Locke, DeGrazia, and Searle, assessing the possibility of AI’s moral standing—whether direct or indirect—through ethical frameworks such as deontology and virtue ethics. It concludes that although attributing personhood to AI remains highly problematic in its current state, addressing this issue is an urgent necessity for contemporary moral philosophy.

Consciousness is one of the most fundamental yet complex issues in the philosophy of mind. Philosophers such as David Chalmers, by proposing the “hard problem of consciousness,” have distinguished between phenomenal consciousness and psychological consciousness. Ned Block has further refined this distinction by formulating it in terms of phenomenal consciousness and access consciousness. On the other hand, John Searle, by differentiating between the first-person and third-person perspectives, and Thomas Nagel, by emphasizing the subjective character of experience, have analyzed this duality from different angles. Although these classifications appear diverse, they all point to the fundamental distinction between inner experience and behavioral or cognitive capacities. The present article, focusing on this essential distinction, examines the question of whether artificial intelligence can possess phenomenal consciousness or merely exhibits psychological consciousness. Answering this question has significant philosophical and ethical implications, as phenomenal consciousness is directly linked to experiences of pain, pleasure, and suffering, and is considered a foundation for many moral rights. This study, adopting a descriptive-analytical approach, argues that the distinction between types of consciousness can serve as a basis for determining different degrees of moral status. For instance, beings endowed with access consciousness but lacking phenomenal experience may be entitled to functional autonomy, yet not to the right not to suffer. In contrast, infants and animals, due to their inner experience, are deemed deserving of the right not to suffer, even if they lack advanced cognitive abilities.

The excessive use of nitrogen fertilizers in greenhouse farming poses significant environmental and health risks, necessitating a deeper understanding of the psychological and emotional factors influencing farmers’ intentions to adopt more sustainable practices. This study extends the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by integrating moral norms and anticipated guilt to provide a more comprehensive framework for explaining greenhouse growers’ decisions regarding nitrogen fertilizer reduction in Iran. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 116 greenhouse owners in Hamedan Province, and data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that attitudes, perceived behavioral control, moral norms, and anticipated guilt significantly influence farmers’ intentions, while subjective norms do not exhibit a significant effect. Notably, moral norms emerged as the strongest predictor, underscoring the critical role of ethical considerations in environmental decision-making. Additionally, anticipated guilt played a crucial role, emphasizing the importance of emotional factors in sustainable agricultural practices. These findings highlight the need for interventions that go beyond rational decision-making models by incorporating ethical responsibility and emotional engagement strategies. Incorporating moral norms and anticipated guilt into the TPB framework significantly improved its explanatory power, increasing the variance explained in farmers’ intentions from 58 to 66%. By addressing both cognitive and affective dimensions, policymakers and agricultural stakeholders can foster lasting behavioral change toward environmentally sustainable farming.

The Enlightenment philosophy, particularly the ideas of Thomas Hobbes and his concepts surrounding the State and Society, serves as a philosophical foundation for numerous subsequent discussions in the fields of social and political sciences. Hobbes’ perspective on human nature and his portrayal of the natural state versus civilization are undeniably among the central tenets of modern thought. He characterizes humanity as the ‘wolf-man’ and underscores the necessity of a social contract-based civilized state to ensure security and safeguard collective interests. Hobbes is primarily concerned with peace, and his political framework, rooted in a modern scientific sense, is designed with the explicit goal of establishing and preserving peace. In the natural state, where humanity exists in an uncivilized condition, each individual is self-interested and disconnected, resulting in a landscape fraught with danger and insecurity. However, a glimmer of hope arises from the fact that human awareness of this predicament serves as the very genesis of contemplation and thought directed towards salvation. The cornerstone of security in the natural state is the equality of all individuals within it. According to Hobbes, society does not represent the spontaneous formation of a fundamental condition for collective life but, rather, the conscious regulation of a potentially volatile state perpetually on the brink of conflict. Through surveys, Hobbes asserts that a majority of people within a society willingly delegate their power and authority to an individual or a group, enabling them to consolidate the various wills into a unified collective will through a voting process. This article aims to explore a fundamental shift in ethics as we transition from classical ethics centered around ‘good’ to modern social ethics founded on ‘security’ and ‘stability.’

Religiosity is one of the most prominent and extensive social factors influencing one’s behavior; however, there is a lack of research analyzing the religiosity impact on pro-environmental behavior, particularly for women in rural areas. To narrow the research gap, this study established a theoretical research model by incorporating religiosity into the Theory of Planned Behavior to explore factors affecting rural female facilitators’ pro-environmental behavior. The extended Theory of Planned Behavior model was consequently tested by empirical data collected from 110 rural female facilitators in Qom Province in the center of Iran. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that subjective norms and environmental attitude were positively and significantly related to pro-environmental intentions. In addition, pro-environmental intentions and perceived behavioral control were found to be significantly associated with pro-environmental behaviors. The results revealed that there was a direct and indirect relationship between religiosity and pro-environmental behaviors via perceived behavioral control. In addition, there was an indirect relationship between religiosity and pro-environmental intentions via subjective norms and environmental attitudes. Therefore, this study revealed that religiosity as social pressure plays an important role in determining pro-environmental intentions and behaviors among rural female facilitators in Iran. Thus, in order to promote pro-environmental behavior, the religiosity aspects should be considered and people should be stimulated to act in a more environmentally friendly mode via religious prism.

Studies regarding rural entrepreneurs in developing countries and, specifically, their well-being have not been sufficiently developed in the literature. The present study was an attempt to fill this gap and to examine important antecedents and outcomes associated with entrepreneurial well-being among a sample of 102 Iranian rural entrepreneurs. This research established a theoretical research model that highlighted the relationships among job fit, entrepreneurial passion, well-being, and persistence. The results of structural equation modeling supported the hypothesized model. In particular, the results indicated that higher job fit was associated with higher levels of entrepreneurial well-being through an entrepreneurial passion mechanism. Moreover, the results supported the hypothesized serial mediating effect. In other words, a high level of job fit enhances entrepreneurial persistence through a high level of entrepreneurial passion and well-being. This study provides significant input to policymakers and practitioners in their efforts to promote the antecedents and outcomes of well-being among rural entrepreneurs.