Samer Alnasir

¿Es la modernidad y el Estado prefabricado el destino ineludible del Sur Global? Esta obra ofrece un diagnóstico incisivo e introspectivo de una modernidad tiránica, no como un fracaso, sino como un sistema de vasallaje perfectamente diseñado. Desde la ira del artesano hasta la sujeción silenciosa del usuario final en el culto al cargamento rentista, el libro traza una genealogía de la dependencia, para finalmente esbozar una hoja de ruta hacia la reparación soberana y la resiliencia de volver a ser éticamente soberano. Disponible en acceso abierto en el repositorio de la UC3M.

The concept of sovereignty and laicism still being instrumented into different projection to that’s which have been conceived and used for through the french revolution and the old regime. This article is not to discuss that, but to delight how another concept deduced from it becomes antagonistic with it in the French context. Laicity referred to the French V constitution, or the act of 1905, it’s not what it appear, and mostly known in the french literature, this article is to reject all that, and go toward an etymological construction of the concept into the french politics since XV century. Then to examination who and how the old regime, and the XIX century have been involved with the religious beliefs then to answer the questions: does the revolution have been laic or atheist? The answer is useful to go forward the examination of the french act of the separation of the State from the churches of 1905, and to determine if that act has been laic or atheist. The questions of how the idea of laicism has been reversed into the interwar period thus to the 1958 constitution to be developed in a further work, but the conclusion proposed here is the evidence of constitutional inter-contradiction and reversed usage of the concept which is being instrumented today further then a constitutional idolatry, but a constitutional nihilism.