Sanjula Rajat

Sexuality plays a central role in Foucault’s philosophy, from his four volume series on the topic to his ideas about medicalization, biopower, and the abnormal. Many of Foucault’s concepts, such as governmentality, biopower, and biopolitics, are useful for analyzing the effects of laws and policies regulating reproduction and sexuality. This article brings Foucault’s ideas to bear on two aspects of sexuality, reproduction and trans health care, to show how the operations of biopower result in reproductive oppression. We briefly trace the history of the professionalization of medicine and the correlative shift in control over reproduction from midwives to doctors. Next we examine the issue of forced or coerced sterilization of people deemed “unfit” to reproduce; for example, those with cognitive or physical disabilities, non-whites, and poor people, exemplifying how biopolitics is a normalizing force. Biopolitics and normalization permeate trans healthcare as well, pathologizing trans people as deviant in order for them to be able to access gender affirming health care and imposing norms based on binary and stereotypical gender categories and whiteness resulting in a restrictive transnormativity. Trans reproduction is subject to passive eugenics which makes sterility a requirement for transition related care. We demonstrate how reproductive oppression harms those who are not cisgender, heterosexual, cognitively and physically abled, and white; sex and biological reproduction are at the center of these processes of reproducing white, middle class workers in dyadic heterosexual family relations to perpetuate a ‘productive’ capitalist system. We conclude by discussing the ways that active and passive eugenics work together in reproducing heteronormativity, the interimbrication of whiteness and heteronormativity, and the implications for citizenship, immigration, and population control in service to the nation-state.

ABSTRACT Dominant narratives of gender transition are often couched in ameliorative, futural frameworks that understand it as a linear process of becoming. However, trans writers and scholars have problematized this narrative, writing about the temporality of transition in terms of the complicated affective milieu of waiting. This article draws on this literature to theorize that waiting operates not just temporally, but also as an affective structure with multiple, changing modalities. This article maps experiences of waiting as they crystallize as anticipation or hope, suspension in time, and dread. Drawing on trans phenomenology to explore waiting as key theme in trans temporalities, this article argues that trans portrayals of waiting and anticipation in the context of interpersonal and institutional discrimination can be understood as a form of chronic temporal harm that backgrounds trans subjects’ lives. This article builds on this analysis to trouble dominant narratives of linear and futural trans temporalities, and concludes by exploring the political potential of trans futurity.

Anchored in a decolonial framework, we understand race and gender as co-constructions of colonial modernity. Drawing on María Lugones’ concept of the colonial/modern gender system, we show that non-normative racialized trans subjects are pathologized through the imposition of a racial-colonial system of binary gender. We argue that coloniality, when adopted into the medical-psychiatric apparatus, takes shape as transnormativity: an individualized, medicalized form of trans identity which is rooted in a white, Western understanding of gender. Building on Jasbir Puar’s framework of homonationalism and trans(homo)nationalism, and critiques of assimilationist queer politics through the lens of racial capitalism and anti-imperialism, we argue that trans(homo)nationalism is the absorption of transnormativity into the broader operations of state power, and see transnormativity as an extension of coloniality, operating as neo-colonialism. We argue that the political implications of trans(homo)nationalism include the sanctioning of violence against and the marginalization of non-normative and racialized trans subjects, and the continued imposition of a regime of racialized normative gendering. This assimilationist nationalist agenda is funneled through the for-profit medical-psychiatric apparatus wherein transition is co-opted into a curative, progress-based temporality. Looking to theorizations of trans temporality, we critique notions of linearity and futurity insofar as they bolster the deployment of racist, nationalist, imperialist state agendas. We articulate a vision for futurity grounded in a trans of color framework which resists assimilation into normativized gender, and call for truly radical futures for trans people which resist medicalized forms of trans identity which subscribe to the colonial, white, Western ideals of gender.

The reproductive justice framework shifted understandings and analyses of reproductive oppression beyond individual ‘choice’ by incorporating analyses of structural injustice, racism, and social and economic concerns. In this article, we build on understandings of the reproductive justice framework by integrating a postcolonial lens and bring the powerful conceptual tools of postcolonial feminist theory to bear on issues of reproductive oppression in India. We articulate the elements of such a postcolonial lens—the transnational operation of race, Orientalism, the subjective experience of colonialism as well as the role of the nation-state and nationalism in shaping reproductive lives—and demonstrate how these elements, along with religion, caste, and right-wing Hindu fundamentalism, structure reproductive oppression in India. Through our discussion of the issues of sterilization, sex-selective abortion, and commercial surrogacy in India we reveal how the underlying coloniality of Malthusian ideas of controlling population to reduce poverty, Orientalist and racist tropes of moral and intellectual inferiority and sexual licentiousness, and the Orientalist and colonial framing of the “East” as backward, uncivilized, and dependent clearly shape reproductive issues in India. Offering a nuanced analysis of the heterogeneity of reproductive oppression within India, our discussion brings reproductive justice into conversation with a feminist postcolonial perspective to foreground the continued impact of colonialism, neo-colonialism, and settler colonialism on reproductive oppression.