• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Scott Anderson

Gordon College
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    9
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    1

 More details
  • Gordon College
    Department of Philosophy
    Undergraduate
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Computing and Information
General Philosophy of Science
  • All publications (9)
  •  59
    Review of Tom Dougherty: Consent under Duress (review)
    Ethics 136 (2): 409-414. 2026.
    Value Theory
  •  16
    Index
    with Jessica Spector, Vednita Carter, Evelina Giobbe, Christine Stark, Carole Pateman, Catharine MacKinnon, Margaret A. Baldwin, Norma Jean Almodovar, Martha Nussbaum, Sibyl Schwarzenbach, Laurie Shrage, Theresa A. Reed, Joshua Cohen, Ronald Dworkin, Laura Kipnis, Tracy Quan, Julian Marlowe, and Debra Satz
    In Prostitution and Pornography: Philosophical Debate About the Sex Industry, Stanford University Press. pp. 445-466. 2006.
  •  158
    Book Notes (review)
    with James Stacey Taylor, Tommie Shelby, Michael A. Neblo, John Morrow, Mark P. Jenkins, Bart Gruzalski, Chad M. Cyrenne, Samuel Black, and Jeremy D. Bendik-Keymer
    Ethics 112 (2): 421-427. 2002.
    Media EthicsSocial and Political Philosophy, Misc
  •  49
    Prostitution and Sexual Autonomy: Making Sense of the Prohibition of Prostitution
    In Jessica Spector (ed.), Prostitution and Pornography: Philosophical Debate About the Sex Industry, Stanford University Press. pp. 358-393. 2006.
    Sex Work and Prostitution
  •  173
    Comment on 'Is prostitution harmful?'
    Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2): 82-83. 2014.
    There are few participants in academic or policy debates over prostitution who would disagree that steps should be taken to improve conditions for those working in prostitution; so Moen1 is in good and plentiful company with respect to his recommendations.I will focus here on the analysis leading up to his conclusions, and with whether it helps us understand why prostitution is so commonly harmful and what it would take to mitigate those harms.i On these matters I am dubious. The question of whe…Read more
    There are few participants in academic or policy debates over prostitution who would disagree that steps should be taken to improve conditions for those working in prostitution; so Moen1 is in good and plentiful company with respect to his recommendations.I will focus here on the analysis leading up to his conclusions, and with whether it helps us understand why prostitution is so commonly harmful and what it would take to mitigate those harms.i On these matters I am dubious. The question of whether or not prostitution is harmful would seem, manifestly, to be an empirical question, rather than a philosophical issue. I take it that Moen's aim is to clarify the evaluative task, and then to evaluate the arguments that can be made to show prostitution is harmful—tasks which philosophers can responsibly engage in. But I would suggest that Moen's approach to this particular subject oversimplifies it by abstracting away from key facts about the context in which prostitution takes place, and thus that it does not offer as strong a case for normalising prostitution as he hopes.The basic thesis of Moen's essay is that if casual sex is harmless, then the sale of casual sexual services for money is also harmless, or at …
    Biomedical EthicsReproductive Ethics
  •  114
    The Coercer’s Role in Coercion
    American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9): 39-41. 2019.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 39-41.
    Biomedical Ethics
  •  126
    Coercion as Enforcement, and the Social Organisation of Power Relations: Coercion in Specific Contexts of Social Power
    Jurisprudence 7 (3): 525-539. 2016.
    Many recent theories of coercion broaden the scope of the concept coercion by encompassing interactions in which one agent pressures another to act, subject to some further qualifications. I have argued previously that this way of conceptualizing coercion undermines its suitability for theoretical use in politics and ethics. I have also explicated a narrower, more traditional approach—“the enforcement approach to coercion”—and argued for its superiority. In this essay, I consider the prospects f…Read more
    Many recent theories of coercion broaden the scope of the concept coercion by encompassing interactions in which one agent pressures another to act, subject to some further qualifications. I have argued previously that this way of conceptualizing coercion undermines its suitability for theoretical use in politics and ethics. I have also explicated a narrower, more traditional approach—“the enforcement approach to coercion”—and argued for its superiority. In this essay, I consider the prospects for broadening this more traditional approach to cover some cases that don’t seem to fit this approach, but nonetheless seem coercive, such as the demands routinely made on people by credit card companies, demands on students by higher educational institutions, and demands made by European financial institutions on the government of Greece. I analyze the similarities and differences of these compared to more central cases of coercion, discussing what lessons can be drawn from this analysis.
    Philosophy of Law
  •  176
    Book ReviewsAlan Wertheimer,. Consent to Sexual Relations.New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Pp. xvi+276. $70.00 ; $26.00 (review)
    Ethics 115 (1): 178-183. 2004.
    Value Theory
  •  129
    Book ReviewsSabina. Alkire, Valuing Freedoms: Sen's Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction.New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Pp. xx+340. $70.00
    Ethics 113 (3): 678-680. 2003.
    Value TheoryDistributive Justice
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback