Sergiy Chernyshov

In this publication, I examine questions of the structure of knowledge based on the conclusions of Kurt Gödel's theorems. I believe these are crucial theorems both for philosophy and for a general understanding of the limits of existing knowledge. "Gödel's second theorem states that if formal arithmetic is consistent, then no formula can be derived from it that substantively asserts the consistency of this arithmetic." .... Wikipedia. Within the system of our description of reality, we cannot mathematically rigorously prove the veracity of our description of reality. Even a consistent, logically sufficient description of reality may leave out many aspects of reality. I think this is a fairly rigorous interpretation. What does this mean for philosophy and for science in general? In my opinion, science does not sufficiently consider alternative possibilities for finding new paths of development. Modern science in many respects is focused on texts. In particular, these are Large Language Models, commonly referred to as AI. There is a notion that words "cover" the entire spectrum of Reality. But at a deep level, this is not so. By using words to reflect on Reality, we automatically follow in the footsteps already formed by previous Scientists. Obviously, discovering something new must be based not only on texts. Achieving a pure perception of Reality is fundamentally important. The question of describing experience is also an important question, but the description must be based on the experience of perception. New paths of development, new knowledge, are relevant in the natural sciences, as well as in philosophy and social sciences. This is clearly evident in the case of quantum physics. Quantum physics operates within a conceptual framework distinct from that of classical physics. The formal expressions of quantum physics cannot be translated into the expressions of the General Theory of Relativity. An understanding of these issues can help lead to entirely new solutions in physics and science in general, including philosophy. Edition July 23, 2026 Sergiy Chernyshov.

Matter and Spirit: Their Mutual Relationship. The question of mutual relations The matter of Spirit is an important question of Philosophy. I propose to consider this issue using the example of comparing a Human and a Computer. In "Scientific Philosophy," Spirit is everything that is not Matter. (It should be noted that in Religious and Esoteric Philosophies, the meaning of the word spirit is somewhat different.) Here, to consider the issue, I propose the concept of the Information Component. When comparing It is obvious to a person with a Computer that the Information Component of a Person, unlike a Computer Program, is inseparable from a Material organism. The information Component of a Person is not just a Program, it is an expression of the processes occurring in Living Matter in the form of Information. At the same time, the interactions of Matter occur in accordance with the principles of this Information Component. The highest manifestations of Human thinking are based on the fundamental manifestations of Biological Life. As far as we know, different branches of evolution, such as Arthropods and Mollusks, came to the Nervous System in their own ways. The Human Mind, The ability to Self-Awareness is the most important achievement of both a Person and life in general. Edition July 18, 2026 Sergiy Chernyshov